Thursday, April 05, 2007

AVERAGE MUSLIM HOUSEHOLD SPEND MORE THAN A HINDU ONE

apr 4, 2007

so there goes that particular chestnut.

can we now expect all 'minority' provisions to be rolled back? after all, sikhs and christists have lots more money than hindus, and mohammedans have a little more money.

so who's the oppressed minority?

why, hindus, of course. as i have been saying all along.

let us repeal article 30 of the constitution, because its basic assumption has been that poor downtrodden minorities are worse off than hindus.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: thirdeye

2 comments:

KapiDhwaja said...

Well one has to give it to the Sikhs. They are prosperous because they are Hard-Working. They don't have qualms in taking any job, be it being a taxi-driver or being the CEO of say Ranbaxy. And they take pride in the fact that Sikhism doesn't allow begging(or Bhiksha), either out of compulsion or done in a religious way.

Non Carborundum said...

Is it because the average Muslim household has more members than a Hindu one? Anyway, at the rate they are multiplying, they won't be a minority too much longer

Rediff: Muslims not a religious minority in UP: Allahabad HC

http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/apr/05up.htm