Thursday, April 19, 2007

M.D. Nalapat: Decline and fall of Indian state under Sonia Maino Gandhi

link

8 comments:

abhishek said...

I am certain that a simple replacement of ‘Gandhi’ with ‘Maino’ will banish her forever from public esteem.

‘Gandhi’ surname should be under copyright act or something. So many people are using the brand value of this name to corner benefits for themselves and their entire families.

e.g., If two people –Jai Kumar and Jai Gandhi are fighting it out in public life- who do you think would be more popular.

‘Antonio Maino’ wants to lord over India? Yuck- damned foreigner!

‘Sonia Gandhi’ – wants to run India. No problem, let’s hand over our country to her.

abhishek said...

Also, that is also why Priyanka is not a 'Vadhera' yet. Like a good Indian Bahu, she remains Priyanka 'Gandhi'.

Feroz 'Khan' became Feroz 'Gandhi' and Indira 'Nehru' became Indira 'Gandhi'

Poor Mohandas..look who is minting money by selling his family silver

lost in thoughts said...

good one :).

was feroz gandhi's last name really khan ? i thought he was a parsi ?

Shahryar said...

I believe the name of the Parsi (Zoroastrian) husband of Indira, daughter of Jawaharlal Nehru, was Feroze GHANDI - which is not an uncommon name amongst Persians.

However I do not how it was transformed into a Gujarati Bania name of GANDHI.

C1ph3r said...

>>was feroz gandhi's last name really khan ? i thought he was a parsi ?

The following text was posted by a commentator on Rediff, in response to some article concerning the Nehru-Gandhi family (IMO the bane of India), and was subsequently removed by the moderators there (given the fact that Rediff has transformed itself into a mouthpiece of Kangress -- no surprises here...after all its run by these so-called McCauley Putras like Ajit Balakrishnan):

Was indira muslim and rajeev christian ?
by Sumanth Singh on Apr 15, 2007 01:01 AM | Hide replies | Hide message
At the very beginning of his book, "The Nehru Dynasty", astrologer K. N. Rao mentions the names ofJawahar Lal's father and grandfather. Jawahar Lal's father was believed to be Moti Lal and Moti Lal's father was one Gangadhar Nehru. And we all know that Jawahar Lal's only daughter was Indira Priyadarshini Nehru; Kamala Nehru was her mother, who died in Switzerland of tuberculosis. She was totally against Indira's proposed marriage with Feroze. Why? No one tells us that! Now, who is this Feroze? We are told, by many that he was the son of the family grocer. The grocer supplied wines, etc. to Anand Bhavan, previously known as Ishrat Manzil, which once belonged to a Muslim lawyer named Mobarak Ali. Moti Lal was earlier an employee of Mobarak Ali. What was the family grocer's name?

One frequently hears that Rajiv Gandhi's grandfather was Pandit Nehru. But then we all know that everyone has two grandfathers, the paternal and the maternal grandfathers. In fact, the paternal grandfather is deemed to be the more important grandfather in most societies. Why is it then nowhere we find Rajiv Gandhi's paternal grandfather's name? It appears that the reason is simply this. Rajiv Gandhi's paternal grandfather was a Muslim gentleman from the Junagadh area of Gujarat. This Muslim grocer by the name of Nawab Khan had married a Parsi woman after converting her to Islam. This is the source where from the myth of Rajiv being a Parsi was derived. Rajiv's father Feroze was Feroze Khan before he married Indira, against Kamala Nehru's wishes. Feroze's mother's family name was Ghandy, often associated with Parsis and this was changed to Gandhi, sometime before his wedding with Indira, by an affidavit.

The fact of the matter is that (and this fact can be found in many writings) Indira was very lonely. Chased out of the Shantiniketan University by Guru Dev Rabindranath himself for misdemeanor, the lonely girl was all by herself, while father Jawahar was busy with politics, pretty women and illicit sex; the mother was in hospital. Feroze Khan, the grocer's son was then in England and he was quite sympathetic to Indira and soon enough she changed her religion, became a Muslim woman and married Feroze Khan in a London mosque. Nehru was not happy; Kamala was dead already or dying. The news of this marriage eventually reached Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. Gandhi urgently called Nehru and practically ordered him to ask the young man to change his name from Khan to Gandhi. It had nothing to do with change of religion, from Islam to Hinduism for instance. It was just a case of a change of name by an affidavit. And so Feroze Khan became Feroze Gandhi. The surprising thing is that the apostle of truth, the old man soon to be declared India's Mahatma and the 'Father of the Nation' didn't mention this game of his in the famous book, 'My Experiments with Truth'. Why?

When they returned to India, a mock 'Vedic marriage' was instituted for public consumption. On this subject, writes M. O. Mathai (a longtime private secretary of Nehru) in his renowned (but now suppressed by the GOI) 'Reminiscences of the Nehru Age' on page 94, second paragraph: "For some inexplicable reason, Nehru allowed the marriage to be performed according to Vedic rites in 1942. An inter-religious and inter-caste marriage under Vedic rites at that time was not valid in law. To be legal, it had to be a civil marriage.

It's a known fact that after Rajiv's birth Indira and Feroze lived separately, but they were not divorced. Feroze used to harass Nehru frequently for money and also interfere in Nehru's political activities. Nehru got fed up and left instructions not to allow him into the Prime Minister's residence Trimurthi Bhavan. Mathai writes that the death of Feroze came as a relief to Nehru and Indira. The death of Feroze in 1960 before he could consolidate his own political forces is itself a mystery. Feroze had even planned to remarry.

Those who try to keep tabs on our leaders in spite of all the suppressions and deliberate misinformation are aware of the fact that the second son of Indira (or Mrs. Feroze Khan) known as Sanjay Gandhi was not the son of Feroze. He was the son of another Moslem gentleman, Mohammad Yunus. Here, in passing, we might mention that the second son was originally named Sanjiv. It rhymed with Rajiv, the elder brother's name. When he was arrested by the British police in England and his passport impounded for having stolen a car it was changed to Sanjay. Krishna Menon was then India's High Commissioner in London. He offered to issue another passport to the felon who changed his name to Sanjay.

Incidentally, Sanjay's marriage with the Sikh girl Menaka (now they call her Maneka for Indira Gandhi found the name of Lord Indra's court dancer rather offensive!) took place quite surprisingly in Mohammad Yunus' house in New Delhi. And the marriage with Menaka who was a model (She had modeled for Bombay Dyeing wearing just a towel) was not so ordinary either. Sanjay was notorious in getting unwed young women pregnant. Menaka too was rendered pregnant by Sanjay. It was then that her father, Colonel Anand, threatened Sanjay with dire consequences if he did not marry her daughter. And that did the trick. Sanjay married Menaka. It was widely reported in Delhi at the time that Mohammad Yunus was unhappy at the marriage of Sanjay with Menaka; apparently he had wanted to get him married with a Muslim girl of his choice.

It was Mohammad Yunus who cried the most when Sanjay died in the plane accident. In Yunus' book, 'Persons, Passions & Politics' one discovers that baby Sanjay had been circumcised following Islamic custom, although the reason stated was phimosis. It was always believed that Sanjay used to blackmail Indira Gandhi and due to this she used to turn a blind eye when Sanjay Gandhi started to run the country as though it were his personal fiefdom. Was he black mailing her with the secret of who his real father was? When the news of Sanjay's death reached Indira Gandhi, the first thing she wanted to know was about the bunch of keys which Sanjay had with him.

Nehru was no less a player in producing bastards. Atleast one case is very graphically described by M. O. Mathai in his "Reminiscences of the Nehru Age", page 206. Mathai writes: "In the autumn of 1948 (India became free in 1947 and a great deal of work needed to be done) a young woman from Benares arrived in New Delhi as a sanyasin named Shraddha Mata (an assumed and not a real name). She was a Sanskrit scholar well versed in the ancient Indian scriptures and mythology. People, including MPs, thronged to her to hear her discourses. One day S. D. Upadhyaya, Nehru's old employee, brought a letter in Hindi from Shraddha Mata. Nehru gave her an interview in the PM's house. As she departed, I noticed (Mathai is speaking here) that she was young, shapely and beautiful. Meetings with her became rather frequent, mostly after Nehru finished his work at night. During one of Nehru's visits to Lucknow, Shraddha Mata turned up there, and Upadhyaya brought a letter from her as usual. Nehru sent her the reply; and she visited Nehru at midnight.

"Suddenly Shraddha Mata disappeared. In November 1949 a convent in Bangalore sent a decent looking person to Delhi with a bundle of letters. He said that a young woman from northern India arrived at the convent a few months ago and gave birth to a baby boy. She refused to divulge her name or give any particulars about herself. She left the convent as soon as she was well enough to move out but left the child behind. She however forgot to take with her a small cloth bundle in which, among other things, several letters in Hindi were found. The Mother Superior, who was a foreigner, had the letters examined, and was told they were from the Prime Minister. The person who brought the letters surrendered them. "I (Mathai) made discreet inquiries repeatedly about the boy but failed to get a clue about his whereabouts. Convents in such matters are extremely tightlipped and secretive. Had I succeeded in locating the boy, I would have adopted him. He must have grown up as a Catholic Christian blissfully ignorant of who his father was."

Coming back to Rajiv Gandhi, we all know now that he changed his so called Parsi religion to become a Catholic to marry Sania Maino of Turin, Italy. Rajiv became Roberto. His daughter's name is Bianca and son's name is Raul. Quite cleverly the same names are presented to the people of India as Priyanka and Rahul. What is amazing is the extent of our people's ignorance in such matters. The press conference that Rajiv Gandhi gave in London after taking over as prime minister of India was very informative. In this press conference, Rajiv boasted that he was NOT a Hindu but a Parsi. Mind you, speaking of the Parsi religion, he had no Parsi ancestor at all. His grandmother (father's mother) had turned Muslim after having abandoned the Parsi religion to marry Nawab Khan.

It is the western press that waged a blitz of misinformation on behalf of Rajiv. From the New York Times to the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post, the big guns raised Rajiv to heaven. The children's encyclopedias recorded that Rajiv was a qualified Mechanical Engineer from the revered University of Cambridge. No doubt US kids are among the most misinformed in the world today! The reality is that in all three years of his tenure at that University Rajiv had not passed a single examination. He had therefore to leave Cambridge without a certificate. Sonia too had the same benevolent treatment. She was stated to be a student in Cambridge. Such a description is calculated to mislead Indians. She was a student in Cambridge all right but not of the University of Cambridge but of one of those fly by night language schools where foreign students come to learn English. Sonia was working as an 'au pair' girl in Cambridge and trying to learn English at the same time.

And surprise of surprises, Rajiv was even cremated as per vedic rites in full view of India's public. This is the Nehru dynasty that India worships and now an Italian leads a prestigious national party because of just one qualification - being married into the Nehru family. Maneka Gandhi itself is being accepted by the non-Congress parties not because she was a former model or an animal lover, but for her links to the Nehru family. Saying that an Italian should not lead India will amount to narrow mindedness, but if Sania Maino (Sonia) had served India like say Mother Teresa or Annie Besant, i.e. in anyway on her own rights, then all Indians should be proud of her just as how proud we are of Mother Teresa.

Chatrapath said...

This article hit the nail on the head. It is becoming common knowledge that Antonina Maino was planted in the UK near Cambridge University through a joint effort of the Vatican and MI5 as part of an operation named "Robert Clive Redux". This operation was meant to "retake" and reoccupy India. The white world is very sore that Britain lost it's jewel in the crown. The British Raj is alive and well through the Congress Party of India. The Congress Party if you remember was started by the Brits because they had the foreseight to realize that they would not be able to rule in name after WW2, but that they could always be the power behind the throne.

During Rajiv Gandhi's reign, the Bank of England seeded money to create an Indian software industry---TCS, Infosys, Wipro, and Satyam are majority-controlled by hedge funds based in the UK. In addition, LN Mittal is a board member of ICICI Bank, which was seeded by the World Bank and the Bank of England. Think about it--Mittal Steel wants to consolidate the entire steel industry. Do you really think that the white world is dumb enough to allow any Hindu to achieve the kind of power that LN Mittal has achieved and just sit by idly? They are NOT like us. They are way too smart and they do NOTHING that reduces their power. Mittal Steel is controlled by the European Bank of Reconstruction. The main intention is to have Mittal deliver the entire iron ore reserves, oil reserves, and thorium reserves of India once the price goes up further!

Also, the takeover of Corus by Tata was to transfer the risk and debt from Corus to the Indian population. Ms. Maino gets a commission on each of these transactions!

Notice than Vodafone is trying to control the Indian cell phone market. Who is doing this? Arun Sarin, the Hindu delivery boy, on behalf of his white masters!

The common person in ALL of these transactions is....SONIA AONTONINA MAINO...She was a sleeper agent that was planted in Cambridge, made intercourse with rajiv, and then worked her way into the most powerful family in India. The source of her power is the entire Indian Security services which is essentially a branch of the MI5. And, her control over vast sums of cash in Swiss Bank Accounts. This money is spread all over the Indian Parliament.

The goal of all these actions is to make the one-billion population in India a CHRISTIAN NATION that will tithe their life savings in order to continue the supremacy of the white race. Christianity is nothing more than the mask that hides the naked face of white domination. Nothing more. Nothing less. Sonia Maino is the agent of this powerful external force.

Anyone who dares to say anything against this powerful force is eliminated, silenced, or killed.

Our ancestors should spit at us for allowing our nation to be conquered by foreigners again. Arjuna must be rolling in his grave at what cowards his sons and daughters have become.

Shame on us.

Chatrapath said...

UNIVERSAL TRUTH---

1. Every WHITE christian nation is a RICH nation

2. Every NON-WHITE christian nation is a POOR country.

Why?

The White Christian nations are smart enough to realize that if you strip the "natives" of their beliefs and destroy their myths and stories, you can cut them off from their ancestors and from the wellspring of their knowledge. Then, once they start worshipping Christ, and they are enslaved forever...

See! When you need anything or wish for anything, just close your eyes and think of Christ. Worship the white man Christ! Worship this white god who looks like us! When you worship Christ, you worship US!

See how it works? Name one non-white Christian country that is worth anything.

Japan is NOT a Christian country and dthey are rich and advanced. China and India are NOT Christian countries and they are the fastest growing economies in the world.

Philippines, and most of African Christian countries are afflicted with disease, AIDS, and have zero chance of achieving any semblance of advancement.

Chatrapath said...

What Hindus fail to realize is that no one cares how nice you are. America vaporized 500K Jap civilians during WW2 but Japs will ALWAYS defer to white Americans and Europeans and will gladly spit at Indians.

No African American will ever ever ever go against a white person, but they will without hesitation attack Indians, Koreans, Hispanics...

If an Indian woman married into George Bush's family, would this Indian woman have as much power in the US as Sonia Maino has in India? Even if she was worth $1 trillion dollars? Could she win a general election for Congress? Senator?

Why?

The hyena will always yield its supper to the lion because it knows that the lion will annihilate the entire hyena pack and its children if it doesn't give up its supper. The lion doesn't even have to warn the hyena. If you look at any animal documentary, the hyena freely gives up its kill to the lion.

We must strive to be more like the lion.