Despite all the ritual noises about egalitarianism, freedom and democracy, the Atlanticists have an intrinsically Christist core. This gets reflected in the totally one-sided reports emanating from their media regarding the reaction to Christian evangelical terrorism in India, in particular the natural (actually quite timid) reaction to the assassination of Swami Lakshmananda Saraswati in Orissa by Western funded evangelical terrorists.
This piece in the
Wall Street Journal is particularly bigoted. Nary a word about the societal disruption, national disharmony, loss of civilisational self esteem caused by conversions to christism induced by force, fraud and allurement.
Not a word about the culpability of Western donors in the religious cleansing of Hindus perpetrated by the missionary saboteurs and their pawns who convert for a bag of Rice, a bottle of liquor or the allurement of licentious behaviour sanctioned by the immoral christist church and it's debauched
"fathers".
In case of the Wall Street Journal, the bigoted world view should come as no surprise. It is now
owned by Rupert Murdoch , the christist hailing from the land of convicts, who also owns the "conservative"
Fox network in the US and
STAR TV in India.
I sometimes wonder about Rediff and their objectivity. They did not publish a single
picture of the gruesome killing of Swamiji or report about the trauma of young children at the Ashram who witnessed the slaughter by Christian terrorists.
But, they prominently displayed an image, probably fictitious or doctored of some
"Christian" as the "
Face of the Orissa riots". This is a virtual repeat of the "
Face of the Gujarat genocide" that depicted some Mohammedan tailor begging for his life from a blood thirsty Hindu mob. That fellow is apparently back in Gujarat living unmolested.....
They also have screaming headlines that say
"50,000 Christians still hiding in forests" next to an irreverent insinuation
that "
Maoists didn't kill Saraswati, Claim VHP".
There is no pretense of objectivity anymore, not even the false fig leaf of
"neutrality" feigned by some Western entities. It has beome obligatory for the Indian media to accept Christist and Mohammedan assertions of victim hood (blatantly false, incendiary and seditious ones at that) as the gospel truth (sic) and conversely depict Hindus as perpetually blood thirsty genocidal maniacs. Their grievances, causes and beliefs are to be rubbished condescendingly and mocked at.
The indoctrination of Western media persons is to be expected. In fact, an occasional objective report pertaining to India and the much reviled Hindoos by, say the BBC or CNN, even allegedly "liberal" entities such as the New York Times or The Guardian would come as a pleasant surprise. But the
portrayal of the Hindu as a sub-human creature by the Indian media, on Indian soil makes one wonder about the agendas they promote and the causes they owe allegiance to....
