apr 12th, 2007
another example of the crap put about by all those NGOs and their shrill harpie females and the brainwashing effect they have on the kaaangress and the 'secular progressives'.
the definition of 'physical abuse' is very western: "you may not punish the child". and yes, that means western children are so well-behaved, so polite, so courteous. it is only occasionally do they show a little disrespect, for example by walking into a school with an AK-47 and killing ten other students. so much for the virtues of western-style child-rearing.
on the contrary, it is important for a child to grow up with a little fear of authority and respect. an occasional cane applied to the bottom does not hurt anything but the kid's ego, and is quite salutary in terms of respect for the common greater good rather their own little amour-propre.
similarly, the definition of 'sexual abuse' is also very western: "you may not touch the child". if you fondle them, dandle them on your knee, hug them, kiss them, all that is 'sexual abuse'. this is yet another fallout from the grim christist ideal of remote, authoritarian fathers (just like their remote, authoritarian yhwh) who never show any affection for children. of course this is also used to accuse people, especially religious hindu people, of sexual abuse, whereas the abuse is only the dirty minds of the NGO banshees. the result of the christist ideal is all those pious and holy 'fathers' of the church, who only occasionally sodomize the little boys and rape the little (and big) girls under their watch. can we say 100,000 priests found guilty of pedophilia, and many more getting away with raping and impregnating nuns? is that a conservative number? how many have been hushed up too, of course.