GOI should take cognizance of enemy action by Italy

Once the Italian ambassador gave his undertaking to the Supreme Court of India to bring back the murderous undertrial marines, "diplomatic immunity" became inapplicable.

By wilfully reneging on the commitment made on paper -
he stands guilty of contempt of court. Therefore, the ambassador should be arrested
and thrown into Tihar Jail.

Actually, I'd like to see the fellow
being picked up by RAW agents at midnight and slapped around a few times prior to his arrest.

What can a bankrupt PIIGS country like Italy, realistically do in retaliation? Would they dare contemplate bombing India?

There are several precedents of
western nations ignoring diplomatic considerations with regard to Indian diplomats - America's TSA detaining a Sari clad Indian consul general for interrogation, detaining at the airport & ordering the Indian representative to the U.N to remove his turban, allegedly "strip searching" the then Defense minister George Fernandes and questioning the former President Kalam - all singled out for special treatment,
merely due to their physical appearance - without even a remote involvement in any criminal wrongdoing - unlike the Italian diplomat.

http://m.timesofindia.com/india/Forget-diplomacy-this-is-enemy-action-Jaitley-on-Italy/articleshow/18950368.cms

Euro trash object to Afzal Guru execution

Just get lost Eurabians. This is why India needs ICBM's capable
of delivering their payload to all European countries that ever colonized any part of India.


http://m.rediff.com/news/report/eu-expresses-regret-over-afzal-gurus-hanging/20130213.htm#

End of sovereignty for third world countries

I think there is a lesson in this for all third world countries, especially India.

The amount of demonization that *India* is being subjected to, in the western media - post
the infamous rape incident - is
unprecedented. Atrocious incidents like this are being deliberately mis-attributed to Hindu religion and culture - fueling neo-colonial urges among the prejudiced Atlanticists.

First, it was the Soviet Union that was balkanized, then it was
Yugoslavia's turn - followed by the secession of East Timor from Indonesia.

Now, the spotlight is being turned on India. Horrific incidents will be used to legitimize the end of Indian "sovereignty", such as it exists - through foreign intervention. We're already seeing this in the form of western funded "NGO" activism, militant proselytisation
and brainwashing of the semi-literate masses by the media collaborators.

It is not a coincidence that all founding members of the "Non aligned Movement" (sic) - Yugoslavia, Indonesia, Egypt, India - have either disintegrated or are on the verge of becoming failed states. It is futile to exult over Pakistan's status as a "failed state." We may soon give them company, in the spirit of
Indo-Pak brotherhood!

The following lines from the interview struck me as particularly significant:

French intervention will cost Mali its sovereignty

http://m.guardiannews.com/world/2013/feb/08/mali




"The question that these images really raise for us is how is it that the French troops who occupied Mali for centuries as barbaric colonisers have come back 50 years later to be greeted as liberators? Does this not leave us seriously perplexed? What is Malian independence really worth? "

Serb Nationalist General Radko Mladic Captured

An article in the Atlantic asks why Serbia captured nationalist general Radko Mladic and handed him over to Europe, while Pakistan continued harboring Bin Laden rather than handing him in.

The answer is simple: Atlanticism.

The Americans will bend over backward in service of European interests, while even letting their own national interests take a back seat. That's how the lobbying power in Washington is set up.

War on Libya More in Europe's Interest than USA's

Obama's former national security advisor General Jim Jones says that the current war on Libya is really more in Europe's interest than in America's interest. Heh, deja vu - anyone remember Kosovo? Again, the Atlanticist lobby have managed to quickly pull off a war when they found it to be in their own interest, but meanwhile they have been shrieking against the war on Taliban and AlQaeda. Where are left-wing mobs to protest for peace over war, when it comes to Atlanticist war-mongering? They are nowhere to be found. The Left are triumphant at the ouster of the 'war-monger' Bush, but when the Euro-centrists want war, then suddenly the Left-wing anti-war movement evaporates. Qaddafi may not be a nice guy, but neither was Saddam, and yet the Leftists screamed their heads off when Bush declared war against him.

European Union observers at Binayak Sen trial

http://www.hindustantimes.com/EU-observers-likely-to-witness-Binayak-Sen-s-trial/Article1-653653.aspx

The European Union wants to send "observers" to attend Xtist
activist Binayak Sen's trial.
And GOI and the BJP state government of Chattisgarh meekly acquiesce to their belligerent request!!

Exactly what locus standi does the European Union have in this case, which pertains to India's national security and sovereignty - threatened by the poisonous "activism" of this alleged "Maoist".

The so-called "Maoist", an alumnus of Christian Medical college, Vellore, Tamil Nadu - and a christist convert - is actually a pawn of Christist missionaries. Civilian "activists" like "Binayak Sen" (sic) are critical elements in the Christist church's strategy of replicating
"liberation theology" in India, originally used to subvert socialist regimes in Latin America - but intended to subvert the sovereignty of the Indian nation - all the while operating under a "Maoist" Burka.

"Maoist", my foot. Since when did Communists start believing in religion? And why do Christist hatemongers like John Dayal, Cedric Prakash et al lead demonstrations in favour of an alleged "Maoist". The whole episode STINKS of a Christian conspiracy to acquire dominion over India. The christist hyena godmen have tasted blood after their success in Nepal - the top Nepalese "Maoists" being converted christists.

The European Union's true objectives of Christian evangelism and hegemony over a developing nation with vast resources such as India stand exposed.

The European Union should be asked to issue an unqualified apology for 1) the colonial legacy in India of several EU members 2) the christist inquisition perpetrated in Goa by the Portuguese.

The EU should also be told to
1) cease all material and moral support to christist evangelical groups on Hindu bhoomi. Their continued presence constitutes an act of war.
2) Pay war reparations to India for colonial loot, to the tune of $10 trillion.

Anti-national traitors such as "Binayak Sen" and Susan "Arundhati" Roy would be summarily executed by a firing squad in a true Maoist paradise like the People's Republic of China.

I do believe that the anatomically deficient Indian Psec Dhimmis can learn a few lessons from the Chinese, at least to the extent it pertains to
safeguarding national interest and dealing with anal Europeans.

Yanuckovich Wins in Ukraine

Victor Yanuckovich has won the Ukrainian elections, returning that country to a pro-Russian stance, and the Atlanticists are outraged. The Moscow Times, a Chindu-like anti-Russian newspaper, openly wails that this is all the fault of allowing the poor to vote. Taste the bile.

Brzezinski Says Obama "Running Out of Steam"

Well, well, professional catspaw Zbigniew Brzezinski has lost no time in opportunistically distancing himself from an Obama he once lionized, now damning him with faint praise. Given that Obama hasn't been religiously following Brzezinski's fanatical obsession in treating Russia like Enemy #1, it was quite predictable that Zbigniew would wait for another political opportunity to pounce, and re-assert his single-minded agenda once again. Obama's latest political woes now present that opportunity. Notice his attempt to exonerate the Chinese govt from guilt over the latest cyber-attacks, as he wonders aloud if mere private business interests might not be responsible - as if they would be capable of such sophistication.

Paris liberation made 'whites only'

By Mike Thomson
Presenter, Document, BBC Radio 4

Papers unearthed by the BBC reveal that British and American commanders ensured that the liberation of Paris on 25 August 1944 was seen as a "whites only" victory.

TIME: Is Europe Falling Out of Love with Obama?

I was waiting for this moment - the moment when the Atlanticists discover that the ethnic token they backed to dislodge Bush is not quite the pliable stooge they hoped he'd be, as Slick Willie was before him.

At least Obama is not another BJ Clinton, or Jimmy Carter.

Yes, he's harassing India over H1-B, and made some goofy remarks about Kashmir, but otherwise he's doing a good job of showing the Atlanticists the door.

This is one advantage of a US president not being of European descent. He may be selling out to China for the time being, but at least he's doing it because China has something more to offer than an ethnic Old Boys' Club.

So finally, the Atlanticists are increasingly finding themselves cast adrift.

Meanwhile, the Republicans are cultivating an obedient gunga din of their own with Bobby Jindal, their rising star who graduated from Brown University with honours - Bubba Cum Laude.
Personally, I'm waiting for this guy to fall flat on his protruding adam's apple.

Atlanticists Condemn Ethnocracy in Central Europe

The Atlanticist NYT is critical of the 'ethnocracy' that exists in the heart of Europe, embodied by Bosnia. Oh, but when it comes to Asia, the same Atlanticists are happy to encourage this ethnocracy in India while despising it elsewhere.

'Overconfident India'

I actually agreed with this editorial from The Economist, entitled Overconfident India.
It's better to achieve our successes first, before holding victory celebrations. (Even still, you know the Europeans are feeling some kind of pique at India's rise.)

Europe Blames US for Failed Treaty Vote

In a true a demonstration of the New Europe's socialist outlook, they're now blaming the US for their failed Lisbon Treaty vote:

French Pol: Europe Has 'Enemies' in the U.S.

Jean-Pierre Jouyet, France's Minister for Europe, suggests that neoconservatives in Washington influenced Ireland's No vote on the EU's Lisbon Treaty

Perhaps CPI-M can launch a bandh to express their outrage and solidarity with their overseas comrades. The Atlanticists will appreciate support from others fighting to preserve a 3-day workweek.

outlook:The Indian Jews: Parallels between anti-Brahminism and anti-Semitism

jun 20th, 2008

some white guy has said this, so it must be true. although indians have been saying this for a long time, that brahmins have been demonized quite intentionally and quite thoroughly, essentially as a prelude to their being wiped out. and the reason is that the brahmins have been the main obstacle preventing christism from taking over.

similarly caste has been vilified because it is another major reason why christists have not been able to convert lots of hindus.

also similarly, the temples at sabarimala, tirupati, and the kanchi matham, as well as mata amritanandamayi, the sai baba, sri sri ravisankar, are all attacked because they are causing the christists to miss their conversion quotas. so they activate their puppets in the media etc.

but if anybody questions any christist godman/godwoman, then all hell breaks loose.

christism is even more dangerous than mohammedanism because the former will stab you in the back while smiling at you; whereas the latter is honest enough to look you in the eye and slice your throat. christism is hypocritical in addition to all its other wonderful fascist traits.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: ven
Date: Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 9:28 AM
Subject: The Indian Jews: Parallels between anti-Brahminism and anti-Semitism
To:

Web| Jun 20, 2008

Counterpoint

The Indian Jews

http://www.outlookindia.com/fullprint.asp?choice=2&fodname=20080620&fname=jakob&sid=1

To be against "Brahminism" is part and parcel of the political correctness of progressive scholars in twenty-first-century India, much like being against Muslims is part of the message of their Hindutva colleagues.

JAKOB DE ROOVER
Social science debate in India has been hijacked by the struggle between secularism and Hindutva for decades now. Usually the Sangh Parivar is blamed for this turn of events. However, it could well be argued that the Hindutva ideologues simply adopted the stance of the secularists. Perhaps the best illustration is the case of anti-Brahminism.

To be against "Brahminism" is part and parcel of the political correctness of progressive scholars in twenty-first-century India, much like being against Muslims is part of the message of their Hindutva colleagues. This indicates that something is very wrong with the Indian academic debate. Promotion of animosity towards a religious tradition or its followers is not acceptable today, but it becomes truly perverse when the intelligentsia endorses it.

In Europe, it took horrendous events to put an end to the propaganda of anti-Semitism, which had penetrated the media and intelligentsia. It required decades of incessant campaigning before anti-Semitism was relegated to the realm of intellectual and political bankruptcy. In India, anti-Brahminism is still the proud slogan of many political parties and the credential of the radical intellectual.

Some may find this parallel between anti-Brahminism and anti-Semitism ill-advised. Nevertheless, it has strong grounds.

First, there are striking similarities between the stereotypes about Brahmins in India and those about Jews in the West. Jews have been described as devious connivers, who would do anything for personal gain. They were said to be secretive and untrustworthy, manipulating politics and the economy. In India, Brahmins are all too often characterised in the same way.

Second, the stereotypes about the Jews were part of a larger story about a historical conspiracy in which they had supposedly exploited European societies. To this day, the stories about a Jewish conspiracy against humanity prevail. The anti-Brahminical stories sound much the same, but have the Brahmins plotting against the oppressed classes in Indian society.

... deleted

The fifth parallel is that both anti-Semitism and anti-Brahminism have deep roots in Christian theology. In the case of Judaism, its continuing vitality as a tradition was a threat to Christianity's claim to be the fulfilment of the Jewish prophecies about the Messiah. The refusal of Jews to join the religion of Christ (the true Messiah, according to Christians) was seen as an unacceptable denial of the truth of Christianity. Saint Augustine even wrote that the Jews had to continue to exist, but only to show that Christians had not fabricated the prophesies about Christ and to confirm that some would not follow Christ and be damned for it.

The contemporary stereotypes about Brahmins and the story about Brahminism also originate in Christian theology. They reproduce Protestant images of the priests of false religion. When European missionaries and merchants began to travel to India in great numbers, they held two certainties that came from Christian theology: false religion would exist in India; and false religion revolved around evil priests who had fabricated all kinds of laws, doctrines and rites in order to bully the innocent believers into submission. In this way, the priests of the devil abused religion for worldly goals. The European story about Brahminism and the caste system simply reproduced this Protestant image of false religion. The colonials identified the Brahmins as the priests and Brahminism as the foundation of false religion in India. This is how the dominant image of "the Hindu religion" came into being.

The sixth parallel lies in the fact that Christian theology penetrated and shaped the "secular" discourse about Judaism and Brahminism. The theological criticism became part of common sense and was reproduced as scientific truth. In India, this continues unto this day. Social scientists still talk about "Brahminism" as the worst thing that ever happened to humanity.

Perhaps the most tragic similarity is that some members of the minority community have internalised these stories about themselves. Some Jews began to believe that they were to blame for what happened during the Holocaust; many educated Brahmins now feel that they are guilty of historical atrocities against other groups. In some cases, this has led to a kind of identity crisis in which they vilify "Brahminism" in English-language academic debate, but continue their traditions. In other cases, the desire to "defend" these same traditions has inspired Brahmins to aggressively support Hindutva.

In twentieth-century Europe, we have seen how dangerous anti-Semitism was and what consequences it could have in society. Tragically, unimaginable suffering was needed before it was relegated to the realm of unacceptable positions. In India, anti-Brahminism was adopted from Protestant missionaries by colonial scholars who then passed it on to the secularists and Dalit intellectuals.They created the climate which allowed the Sangh Parivar to continue hijacking the social sciences for petty political purposes.

The question that India has to raise in the twenty-first century is this: Do we need bloodshed, before we will realise that the reproduction of anti-Brahminism is as harmful as anti-Muslim propaganda? What is needed to realise that the Hindutva movement has simply taken its cue from the secularists? Do we need a new victory of fascism, before we will admit that pernicious ideologies should not be sold as social science?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jakob De Roover is a postdoctoral fellow of the Research Foundation (FWO) Flanders at the Research Centre Vergelijkende Cultuurwetenschap, Ghent University, Belgium
___________________________________________________________________

Read how the concept of evil brahmin came about

http://www.hvk.org/Publications/cihp/ch6.html

Asians Are Red, Euros Are Blue

An op-ed piece by Roger Cohen points out that while Europeans are rooting for a Democrat (Wilsonian) victory in the US elections, Asians on the other hand are hoping for a Republican victory.

Environmental Colonialism

A piece in the Sunday Herald asking when environmental preaching became the newest form of colonialism? Funny how China with its greater population has 67 vehicles per thousand people, and most of these are mid-sized to larger cars that don't get 50MPG. In India with its 7 vehicles per thousand people, Tata has merely announced the Nano, and not yet even built or distributed it to the yearning masses, and already is garnering more environmental rants than China has cumulatively received over the past couple of decades. Talk about a double-standard.

Eek! The Pandits are Coming!

Notice how NYT reacts to the news about Vikram Pandit being promoted to CitiGroup CEO, by immediately publishing an article that also mentions Farooq Kathwari, CEO of Ethan Allen Furniture, who is also an activist for Kashmiri separatism:

M. Farooq Kathwari, chief executive at Ethan Allen Interiors, said he had been shaped by his experience moving on his own at age 21 from the Kashmir region of India to the United States.

“A foreign-born person is by nature an entrepreneur,” Mr. Kathwari said. “When you leave your home, leave your family and come to a different country, you have had the instincts of an entrepreneur.”

Mr. Kathwari said his childhood in Kashmir, hiking up mountains, taught him the importance of pacing himself. The political conflict there, he said, taught him the importance of fairness. “Justice” is now a leadership principle at Ethan Allen.

Vikram Pandit was born in Nagpur, Maharashtra, and has never had any connection with the Kashmir issue. After all, Pandit is a fairly common surname. But just because he has the name Pandit, the India-baiting brigade at NYT go into a tizzy, and have to go out of their way to make reference to Kashmiri Muslims and the separatist cause.

Because it would be ghastly to talk about a Pandit without giving equal time to a non-Pandit Kashmiri Muslim, now wouldn't it? Never mind the fact that Vikram Pandit isn't from Kashmir.

What miserable racial stereotyping by NYT. All these idiots see is Kashmir.

European States Collect Tithe

Why is it that in many European countries, the taxation apparatus of the state is used to collect the tithe for specific Christian groups? Isn't that a violation of the separation between Church and State? They don't do that for Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, Jews, etc. Why is this facility provided to certain religions and not to others? It's a double-standard worth being aware of.

CA textbooks lawsuit: Appeal for funds

aug 28th, 2007

NOTE: This post has been deliberately post-dated, and will remain on top of the blog for a few days. i am doing this so that people will pay attention to it and it won't disappear down the stack. thanks!

==================

please donate generously. i have sent them a check for what i could afford.

this group has done great work in exposing witzel and the white guys masquerading as 'dalits' as charlatans, and their approach which is direct and related to the fundamental rights of citizens -- yes, even hindu citizens have rights, amazing as that concept might be -- is likely to pay dividends. please support them as much as you can.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Arvind Kumar

Dear Friend,

First of all, we would like to thank you for your support last year. The lawsuit is progressing well through the discovery process. The long and tiring discovery is nearing its end. CAPEEM has found incriminating evidence of active collaboration between various parties to discriminate against Hindu Americans and Americans of Indian origin through sixth grade history and Social Studies textbooks. The lawsuit exposes the workings of California Department of Education, State Board of Education, Michael Witzel, James Heitzman and Stanley Wolpert, and Christian Mission Organizations, Dalit Solidarity Network and Dalit Freedom Forum, masquerading as Dalit organizations.

In the next phase, at the end of discovery, CAPEEM will depose the CDE officials, SBE members, and their experts. The process is very involved in this stage. Our funds are at a low.

We look forward to your generous support this year again.

Please make your contribution today; your support is very important.

Send your check payable to CAPEEM to: PO Box 280442 Northridge, CA 91328.

Or Donate online: visit our website http://www.capeem.org and follow donate link

Tax-Id 56-2565521.
CAPEEM is a tax exempt non profit organization.
For questions please write to info@capeem.org or call (646) 594-4397

Thanks and Regards,

Arvind Kumar
Director,
California Parents for the Equalization of Educational Materials (CAPEEM)
www.capeem.org

Bilderbergs, Trilateral Commission

It's always good to know your enemies, and about what makes them tick. Here's a little more on the Bilderbergs and the Trilateral Commission. They are core founders of Atlanticism and the Bilderberg Group in particular are promoters of Euro-centrism. As you can see, membership in the Bilderbergs is exclusively restricted to citizens of Europe and North America. No coloured people allowed.

But it's worth asking -- why would the Trilateral Commission allow Japan in, to represent Asia? Well, it's not just because of Japan's industrial power, but clearly because it has a history of territorial disputes with Moscow. Gradually, the Trilateral Commission has expanded its Asian membership to include South Korea and Indonesia, which have also been pitted against communism -- but now China has also been included, because of its counterweight potential against Moscow.