Sunday, February 15, 2009

how to get the system to silence your critics

feb 15th, 2009

a friend explained to me how the mohammedans and christist game the system.

there is the section 295A about hurting 'religious sentiments'. also the local authorities are very concerned about any threats of riots or breakdown of law and order.

so what the semitics do is to round up a bunch of their thugs (in the case of mohammedans) or simpering, superior godmen (in the case of christists). a few hundred at a minimum, preferably a few thousand.

then these fellows show up and demonstrate around the house or other facility of the 'accused'. mohammedans shout blood-curdling oaths promising violence. christist get their pals in the media and in america to put pressure on sonia et al. this flows down to the local authorities who then file reports saying that there is a major threat of law and order breaking down, because the "religious sentiments of xyz have been offended", and, this is the clinching part, THERE IS CLEAR EVIDENCE OF SAID OFFENDEDNESS, namely, the threatened riots and other marches.

therefore, it is easy for the courts to act on the 295A statute and ban the innocent.

in the case of hindus, when there is really serious hurt to their sentiments (as in the case of karunanidhi shouting obscenities against rama), we all sit at home, feeling terrible, and we write on the internet. what we need to do is to organize a march, shout some blood-curdling things like the mohammedans do, etc. (of course, the minute you do this, the ELM will say the BJP, or the bajrang dal, or the RSS was wanting to kill "2000 mohammedans" and cedric "we mothers invent out of necessity" prakash will get ratzy to say things like "in india hindus are hurting christists" even if the issue had nothing to do with christists. then danny boyle will make a movie about "2000 mohammedans" who were burned to death or had their throats slashed because they were "talking to hindu girls". this will get an oscar, and tom friedman will... anyway, i digresss.)

what hindus need to do is to make their OFFENDED RELIGIOUS SENTIMENTS EVIDENT by marching in protest.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sriram

The leftist media in india were silent on this .Not a word about this in any of the leading dailys who were busy sending chaddis to mutalik.
The Statesman's editor Ravindra Kumar and publisher Anand Sinha were detained by the police in Calcutta after complaints.
Muslims said they were upset with the Statesman for reproducing an article from the UK's Independent daily in its 5 February edition.
The article was entitled: "Why should I respect these oppressive religions?"

It seems in india only christians and muslims ve the right to criticize hinduism.



witan said...

From the BBC report: "Some Muslims close to the Jamiat-e-Ulema e Hind (The Organisation of Indian Scholars, a leading Islamic group in India) later filed a complaint with police alleging that the publication had "outraged their religious feelings", which is an offence under Section 295 A of the Indian Penal Code."

I recall that it was the same Jamiat-e-Ulema-Hind that triggered violence in the protest against Taslima, and Jamiat-e-Ulema-Hind was again in the forefront of the anti-land acquisition movement in Singur and Nandigram, and was responsible for wreaking havoc in Kolkata (in November 2007). Apparently, it has strong links with Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam, a political party in Pakistan. The "secularists" in our country have handed our nation over to these Muslim fanatics and terrorists.

blogger said...

Hey Rajeev, for example in this case

No action taken. Why? Because daughter of Manmoron singh is one of the culprit whose book/thesis has really offensive writings on God Shri Ram.