Monday, October 08, 2007
for communists, any and all pandering to mohammedans is welcome
oct 4th, 2007
i pointed out the repeated references to the ram setu as adam's bridge to support mohammedan mythology. how much evidence do they have that adam existed? or that he went across the bridge? or that he stood on some peak for 1,000 years? answer: none, whatsoever.
i would like to see the communists agitating to call 'allah bund' in gujarat 'mao bund'. after all, they don't have any evidence about allah's existence, either, right, but they have evidence that mao existed.
here's another example, sent in by reader thirdeye: