Friday, March 10, 2006

OUTLOOK EDITOR VINOD MEHTA FINED FOR LYING AS USUAL.

mar 10th

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: n

Please tell everyone. Proves the standards of the lie-dump he runs, too.
Cheers

http://www.ptinews.com/pti/ptisite.nsf/$all/57ACA0CDF85A39286525712B004488C6?Opendocument

"
Press Release
Source : N.Umasankar
Category : International

BBC apologises and withdraws article against Kanchi Shankaracharya

Chennai ( Wednesday, March 8 , 2006 05:58:34 PM)
In response to protests from a group of devotees of Sri Jayendra Saraswathi, the Shankaracharya of Kanchipuram, the BBC has removed from its website an article by Mr. Vinod Mehta, the editor of Outlook magazine. Further, the BBC has paid out £4000 for the legal costs incurred to obtain this out-of-court settlement. These devotees came together on a web-based discussion forum, www.kanchiforum.org.

The website article was the transcript of a talk given by Mr. Mehta on 28 January 2005 on BBC Radio 4 about the Sankararaman murder case. After months of protracted protests, the BBC Complaints Unit authorities adjudicated that the talk contained "serious errors" and inaccuracies on several counts. Mr. Mehta had wrongly asserted that the charge sheet contained several police accusations of personal misconduct by the Shankaracharya. The BBC has apologized for the errors and the delay in reporting them.

On a number of points Mr. Mehta's account ran counter to the findings of the Supreme Court of India, made public some three weeks before the BBC talk titled "A View from India."

Mr. Mehta had passed over the Supreme Court verdict in total silence.


Media contact details:

Mr N.Umasankar Advocate New No 71
Old No 29
burkit Road Thyagarayanagar Chennai 600017 Ph: 044 24339500 Mibile: 9444019500 email: tact@vsnl.com
annmaldas@yahoo.com
Mr S.Anantharaman Coimbatore Ph: 04224395400 mobile: 9894339485 email:anantharaman@touchtelindia.net
tact@vsnl.com

"

1 comment:

iamfordemocracy said...

Pound 4000 for such deplorable crime! Sometime back, you had run an article on the price of a Hindu life. Try doing a similar one on Hindu blasphemy. If the Jagadguru can be subjected to such blasphemy and the cost of a legal defeat is just 4000 pounds, what of a commoner?

How much money must STARNEWS must have made by showing the Jagadguru in bad light?