Tuesday, October 09, 2007

malaysia now has some of the most fundamentalist mohammedans in the world

oct 9th, 2007

we have seen on this blog talk about the astronaut's 'problem'. but the subtexts are quite grave:

1. note how the names have all become totally arabized. no more malay names or, horrors, sanskrit-derived names (se asia was once hindu-buddhist, so there are a lot of sanskrit terms around)

2. note how as malaysia became more prosperous, the mohammedans have become more bigoted. the same has been true of saudi arabia and other arab states as well. when they were poor, eating sand, they were less intolerant.

therefore, the reason for mohammedan bigotry and fundamentalism is *not* poverty, it is *wealth*. the richer you are, the more insane you are in regards to jihad.

http://www.wired.com/science/space/news/2007/09/mecca_in_orbit

5 comments:

habc said...

constitution of the Muslim Doctors and Dentists Association UK:

2.1.1. To advance the Islamic religion in the practice of medicine in the United Kingdom.

and

2.1.4 To promote the preservation and protection of the good health of Muslims in the United Kingdom.

habc said...

Ot- what does Prakash Karat have to say about this

Bengal to privatise 10 public sector units

also their so called 'land reforms' have already solved all their problems then why are they having all those ration store riots in WB?

Sudarshan said...

The equation "Muslim Prosperity = Muslim Bigotry" doesn't quite square with the bigotry of Pakistan or Bangladesh.Pakistan is the epicentre of world terrorism but is only rich in fundoos. And Bunglingdesh is dirt poor (but they believe that if they pray as hard as the Saudis they will also become petroleum-rich). As for Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, one may reserve comment: these aren't even functioning countries - mere lines on the map.

nizhal yoddha said...

didnt say it was a necessary condition, just that it's a sufficient condition. i also didn't make that equivalence.

poor mohammedans, as you show, can be bigots, but making them richer does not make them less bigoted, it usually makes them *more* bigoted. i conjecture that even unbigoted ones become bigoted as they become more prosperous. so the solution to mohammedan terrorism is *not* to give them more. it's counterproductive. the dhimmi nostrum of 'give them more' is totally wrong.

Sudarshan said...

OK. Point taken. Poor Bigots (Type A) only endanger their immediate neighbourhood. Rich Bigots (Type B) have a reach as big as their resources allow them, so they are certainly lots more dangerous. What to speak of Type B sending squads of Type A's far and wide equipped with terror knick-knacks like bombs, guns etc; and the promise of Behisht at the end of it all.