aug 20th, 2006
gasp, someone is saying pakistanis are guilty. hallelujah!
but i wonder: what is 'regional terror'? is that the killing of hindus? i guess we should explain to all the hindus whose family members have been killed by mohammedan terrorists that it's ok since it's only 'regional terror'.
when mohammedans (like LET) attempt to kill white people, of course thats a big deal, very different, 'global terror'.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Raghu
Date: Aug 20, 2006 10:20 PM
Subject: From Wall Street Journal - Regional Terror Goes Global
To:
3 comments:
Amartya Sen and his "buddies" could be mafia who supported terror by justifying them using economics, as long as it is on hindus. In the following article he mentions of multiple identities, but doesn't buzz an inch when he has an option of digging at hindus - the source from which he got so much. It seems all leftists are even bored by reading Amartya Sen, leftist doesn't have any radical revolutionary appreciations of Sen yet - That is no comment yet published in rediff on his interview.
http://in.rediff.com/news/2006/aug/18inter.htm
And look at this article in Time:
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1254773,00.html
Hard to tell if they're trying to expose the militancy, or just give it a folksy flavour.
Anyway, when I see WSJ naming PakJihadis as the illness and not the cure, then it makes me wonder what the hell has happened to good ol' Nancy DeWolf Smith, that WSJ editor and former head of Radio Free Europe who used to gush so enthusiastically over the Taliban. Are cracks starting to show in the Atlantic Sea Wall? Maybe she's gone the way of Barbara Crossette.
Meanwhile, I want to put up the latest from the Western-based Islamist journalist I detest the most:
Mohammed Haroon Siddiqui Belches Again
This former suit-salesman from Hyderabad has been an India-basher from Day One. When Air India's Kanishka flight was bombed by the Khalistanis in 1985, he loudly parroted accusations that the Indian govt did it. He's been an incessant activist on Kashmir. After the first Gulf War, he was a rallying point for Islamist activism. As an editor of the Toronto Star, he eventually got so shrill, that the Toronto Star had to push him into a semi-retirement as "Editor Emeritus".
And now feeling alienated in the post-9/11 environment, he points to India's minority-biased system as an example the West needs to follow.
These days, the bastard has garnered awards from Indian govt and various "community groups" for his "great service" to India.
No Islamic activist apologist journalist infuriates me more than this miserable predator. He might as well be another Arjun Singh.
Post a Comment