aug 30th, 2006
thanks, kapidhwaja, for the post on the chinese being denied security clearance for port building.
here is a news story that says this is not true.
however, it is interesting that the vizhinjam port in trivandrum would have been destroyed anyway by t r baalu, the shipping minister. he, the 'dravidian' fundamentalist, shows the true colors of 'dravidians':
a. they are basically a creation of the christists. baalu is the person who famously went to the paul dhinakaran mad-fundamentalist conversion machine church in chennai and declared that he, baalu, was 'ashamed to have been born a hindu'. when hindus protested peacefully against this by symbolically excommunicating baalu, the hindus were arrested. (food for thought: what do mohammedans do under similar circumstances? riot, murder, assassinate, etc. nobody would have been arrested, and the media would have supported their mayhem under the general heading of 'hurt sentiments of the minority community', which is an open excuse for mass murder, burning people alive, and such other fun stuff. no mohammedan would have been arrested even if they assassinated baalu)
b. the 'dravidians' are extreme tamil chauvinists. when it comes time to grabbing territory, they claim that kerala is also 'dravidian' -- the LTTE had posted maps which showed 'tamil eelam' as consisting of kerala as well as tamil nadu plus northern sri lanka (those maps have since been removed from their website). but when it comes to providing any benefits to kerala, the whole 'dravidian' bunkum goes out the window. so, for instance, baalu is dead against vizhinjam in kerala because he wants to promote a) tuticorin and b) colachel ports, which are in tamil nadu.
thus, 'dravidianism' == narrow-minded tamil imperialism, an exact match with
chrisitsm == white imperialism
mohammedanism == arab imperialism
marxism == chinese imperialism
this is why i categorize the 'dravidians' as neo-semites, whereas the jews and zoroastrians are paleo-semites, and christists and mohammedans are meso-semites.
this is also why kerala, karnataka and andhra totally reject any 'dravidianism': we dont want to live under a tamil empire, any more than we like living under a hindi dictatorship.
c. the 'dravidians' insist on acting like bulls in china shops when they become part of the central govt. on the one hand, you have ambumani ramadoss wreaking major havoc on the medical establishment by messing with AIIMS etc. why? why is he acting like a rustic buffoon, reminding one of raj narayan et al? dayanidhi maran is busy forcing companies in IT to invest in chennai. and baalu is attempting to destroy the vizhinjam port. if these guys really want to secede and form a tamil nation, we should gladly put them on a boat and ship them to the LTTE, gift-wrapped.
'dravidians' are utter maniacs.
i love san's idea of a 'dravidian' homeland in baluchistan. there have been other proposals to create a 'dravidian' homeland in the arctic, but baluchistan sounds good.
let the LTTE fight it out with the ISI. they deserve each other. yeah, go, brahui. brahui is practically tamil (i assert, and shall prove it so by repeated assertion!) so LTTE-Baluchi zindabad!
the pakis are a little scared of this connection. the LTTE are pretty smart operators, and if they hook up with the Baluch, they will make life hell for the pakistanis and the chinese. this is an outcome to be welcomed. the appointment of a pakistani air force general as adviser to the sri lankan government is a heaven-sent opportunity for turning the LTTE against the ISI and discreetly giving them funds to wreck gwadar. after all, the LTTE has previously also had trouble with the chinese-supported JVP in sri lanka.
let us keep vaiko and baalu and ramadoss busy with LTTE-Baluch insurrection plans, and that will keep them out of other mischief.