aug 23rd, 2006
thank you, san, for the pointer.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/08/23/aztecs.cannibals.reut/index.html?section=cnn_topstories
yvette rosser has talked about the fact that there was continuous hindu resistance over centuries to the mohammedan invaders. it is not as though the mohammedans simply walked in and took over (and the 'oppressed' hindus welcomed them with marigold garlands).
it's good to see that the aztecs were also not in awe of the spaniards and kowtowing to them as 'gods', as the mythology written by europeans suggests. so much for mythmaking by the white guys.
also note that the spanish victory over the aztecs was accomplished with the collusion and collaboration of locals; does this remind anybody of what happened in india? in particular, what happened at vijayanagar?
and also about what's happening in india *today* with the compradors, fellow-travelers and fifth columnists, and just plain judases?
1 comments:
I think that Indians should support the desire of Hispanics to get more in touch with their original native roots, instead of them regarding themselves as a European-derived people.
I admit, while Chavez is flaming leftie, he at least has a healthy opposition to the Roman Catholic Church which was imposed by another continent so long ago.
Just as the anti-Moscow Catholic Church has no hesitation about siding with the Left in India, then similarly I think that we Indians should have no reservations about siding Leftists such as Chavez, at the expense of the Roman Catholic Church. The island-marooned Castro is irrelevant these days, despite the reverence Indian commies show him. We need to get our Indian commies more towards Chavez, whom we can all support together. Then it will be the Roman Catholic Church's turn to feel isolated. Besides, Chavez has lots of oil, and these days he's even willing to sell it at a discount to China. Why shouldn't India court the same deal?
Post a Comment