Nothing confusing about the analysis. He is writing typical sickular drivel. Nowhere he acknolewdges the fact that India as is because Hindus are still a majority. So many places, it seems like he has directly lifted from Tom Friedman of New York Times articles (or is it other way round ;)) for example:
1. Shabana Azmi quote about dropping Shahi Imam into Afghanistan. 2. Azim Premji being richest Indian. 3. Bollywood stars etc etc.
Not a single original thought in whole article except few political science jargon big words.
Another temple is attacked- 5 hindus are halaaled, but for our English media South Africa pulling out of SL is a bigger story.
1 comment:
Nothing confusing about the analysis. He is writing typical sickular drivel. Nowhere he acknolewdges the fact that India as is because Hindus are still a majority. So many places, it seems like he has directly lifted from Tom Friedman of New York Times articles (or is it other way round ;))
for example:
1. Shabana Azmi quote about dropping Shahi Imam into Afghanistan.
2. Azim Premji being richest Indian.
3. Bollywood stars
etc etc.
Not a single original thought in whole article except few political science jargon big words.
Another temple is attacked- 5 hindus are halaaled, but for our English media South Africa pulling out of SL is a bigger story.
Post a Comment