Wednesday, November 07, 2007

Protest against temple demolition in Malaysia

Here's another in Tamil Nadu. It is the least that ordinary citizens in India can do within the framework of a dhimmocracy. Imagine the rioting that would have been triggered by the demolition of even the most dilapidated Mohammedan structure anywhere in India and the immediate secular outcry in justification of their rioting. It is surprising that the BJP has not issued any statement on this while the Mohammedans in Malaysia continue their intimidatory tactics. Or is the English language media simply censoring it out? If the UPA dhimmis can issue demarches to Denmark and cancel the Danish Prime Minister's state visit to India over a mere cartoon, why the conspicuous silence when it comes to persecution of Hindus in Malaysia, undoubtedly an issue of much more immediate concern to the nation? This is just the latest instance where tangible harm has been caused to the Hindu minority in Malaysia, but the emergence of Malaysia as a jihadi state should ring alarm bells across world capitals.

2 comments:

Unknown said...

Are you aware that the points you raised have already been raised more than a year ago by the writer Sharanya Manivannan in her letter to the Dr Manmohan Singh, which is on her blog? That letter created awareness all over the internet. It is a shame that violent demonstrations are what it has finally taken for governments to notice what is going on. As a Malay I am worried for how this implicates my religion, but as a malaysian I am happy that this human rights issue will be tackled.

karyakarta92 said...

I had not heard about the author or her blog until now. But, I did check it out and just from a cursory glance, it looks like she needs a little guidance. Her blog post says: "Hindu activists involved -- am worried about this development ...." , proceeds to condemn the Bajrang Dal as fundamentalist based on a mere Wikipedia entry!! and further says

"I don't see this as a religious issue"
.

What is this if not a religious issue? It is entirely an issue of religious freedom and liberty being smothered by an imperialistic death cult masquerading as a religion. It would be good for a change if, as she says "awareness is created among moderate, liberal and/or secular quarters as well...." , but what does it say about the dhimmitude of those quarters if a temple demolition is required to jolt them awake; and their concern about Hindu activists getting involved? So, it's ok for Mohammedans to demolish Hindu temples, butcher Hindus and rape Hindu women, but it's NOT ok for Hindu activists to protest against that? I'm sorry but I respectfully disagree with such angles. BTW, sending a letter to Shikhandi MMS is a good tactic for rhetorical purposes, but it would be futile to seriously expect anything out of it.