nov 19th, 2007
those 'dravidians' are really good at making up stuff, aren't they?
periyar, the coward, bully, pedophile, ruffian, will come out just like jesus "giving up his life for the dalits of india". ROTFL. one guy who never existed, and the other who used to pee in his pants whenever his 'rationalism' was challenged by a mullah!
both total frauds and hoaxes. both invented by christists for purposes of making money and conversion.
i'd really like to know how old maniyamma was when she started 'ministering' to periyar. he was about 62 at the time; she must have been about 16. i'm pretty sure this was a case of pedophilia, but i noticed the 'dravidians' are very coy about maniyamma's age. they got married when periyar was 70. (as mentioned before, 'ministering' by young women to decrepit old man is a semitic tradition, as with the aged david and abishag the shunammite in the bible, although david, in his time a serious philanderer, couldn't get it up for abishag, but he used to sleep with her to share her body heat. much good that did for abishag, i am sure. bloody perverts. (reminds me of the classic japanese novel by yasunari kawabata, 'the house of the sleeping beauties', translated in malayalam as 'saha-sayanam' (sleeping together), where old men pay for the privilege of sleeping -- just sleeping -- with drugged young women.)
i started really disliking periyar because of the 'vaikom hero' crap. the old fart went to vaikom, and was roundly ignored. but in 'dravidian' mythology, he single-handedly made the vaikom satyagraham happen in 1924, wherein the lower-castes demanded the right to use the roads around the great siva temple in vaikom, and which led eventually to the temple entry proclamation in 1936. i am really pissed off because it was people from my own family who actually led the struggle and got beaten up and jailed, while this jerk came, stayed in comfort, and went back with nobody paying any attention to him (bloody vaikom 'tourist', he was). remember, vaikom was part of the princely state of cochin, and this creep, coming from the madras presidency, had no followers in travancore-cochin. he was totally superfluous. but the 'dravidian' mythology about him is so big that it gave me an insight that it was likely that everything else the 'dravidians' say is also bullshit. a little research showed that this is so. 'dravidianism' is a neo-semitic death cult-let started by bishop caldwell based on DRUMROLL the 'aryan' invasion theory, which in turn is based on DRUMROLL the genesis chapter of the bible. *three* hoaxes in a row! it's just yet another way of trying to destroy civilization, turn india into a cultural waste-land, and introduce christism into the vacuum.
the 'dravidian' is about as real as the tooth-fairy.
http://specials.rediff.com/movies/2007/nov/20sd6.htm
2 comments:
On a lighter note, look who the "Dravidian" lunatics have selected to portray Periyar's minor concubine. LMAO alert.
From the link:
Jyothirmayi plays his first wife while Khushboo plays the revolutionary's second wife, Maniyamma.
The bosomy "North Indian" Khushboo, her with the Dravidian temple dedicated to her!!!
HAAAAAA HAAAAAAA HAAAAA, ROTFL, LMAO
"Revolutionary", my foot.
And who might the scriptwriter be for this "Dravidian" pornography.
The "revolutionary" stealth christist poet Karunanidhi? Actually, if these "dravidian" idiots made a Yesu movie, they'd cast some other bimbo as the "Virgin" Mary and end up offending the Vatican.
Mallika Sherawat would be a good fit for the role of Virgin Mary. What d'ya think?
Post a Comment