Wednesday, July 04, 2007

Pakistan: Anatoly Leivin vs Peter Bergen

Here's a video of a debate between Anatoly Leivin and Peter Bergen on what should be done on Pakistan. I've read Leivin's various writings, including on Europe, and they seem to lean towards the Atlanticist side from what I see. He's a good speaker, but ultimately he seems to lean towards accommodating Pak as a priority. It's good insight to watch their speeches, though.

2 comments:

sansk said...

the true fun with Pakistan is that few people (in the West that is) seem to know how to handle its worst creation.

It is an business running military that always loses active wars and promotes civilians to fight its wars. It is a miliatry that is usually mistaken for a nation. The military is nothing but islamist radicals who appear to be more suave and pleasant to Western (and Indian) less-intelligent souls comapred to their brothers in arms who do the dirty work of infiltration and slaughtering civilians of other nations.....


As someone used to say on Sulekha, Give Peace a Chance , Nuke Pakistan!

sansk said...

here is an example of bravery (and treachery) of generals of war on civilization.

http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/jul/04pak7.htm