url
Posting in part as Pioneer doesn't archive...
Mother of all insults by Andhra CM
Omer Farooq | Hyderabad
YSR lashes out at Chandrababu in unparliamentary way
The Andhra Pradesh Assembly witnessed an unprecedented clash between the ruling Congress party and almost the entire Opposition when Chief Minister YS Rajasekhara Reddy, in an intemperate outburst against leader of Opposition N Chandrababu Naidu, dragged Naidu's mother into the debate.
Replying to the allegations of serious irregularities in mining activity in the Obulapuram area of Anantapur by the company of Janardhan Reddy, Rajasekhara said that he would expose Naidu in such a way that he would regret his birth.
"What I am saying now is only a preamble. There are a lot of things to say. After I complete what I have to say, Chandrababu, you will, in fact, regret why unnecessarily you came into your mother's womb and you will feel that it would have been better if you were not born at all. What are you talking! I will expose you," the Chief Minister said as the entire House was left stunned for some time before the TDP benches burst into protest.
The outburst, which left almost all the Opposition members shocked and pained, came after the Question Hour when the TDP members tried to raise the issue of alleged siphoning off of minerals from Obulapuram mining area, the scene of a protest by the TDP since Saturday.
The issue rocked the House right from the morning when 21 TDP members were suspended after they tried to press for an adjournment motion on the issue
during the Question Hour. After the question hour when they returned to the House, the TDP members again raised the issue.......
22 comments:
What else can we expect from a person with criminal background?
My expectations are at the right level, and the CM meets the expectations.
Samuel Reddy (YSR) is a bloody christist goonda who needs to be taught a lesson. A few years ago, when C.B Naidu was the CM & Samuel was the leader of opposition, there was a "naxalite" assasination attempt on C.B Naidu using landmines in Tirupati, where he escaped with injuries. Samuel Reddy then staged a drama, going on hunger strike to protest lax security for the CM of Andhra Pradesh. Tamil Nadu & Kerala are pretty much lost for Hindus. A.P is going the same way with this
Samuel Reddy character. Actually, I have reason to suspect he is not even a "Reddy". It is common in AP for converts from the lowest Madiga caste to stealthily choose "Reddy" as a last name,
Alex Reddy, Gregory Reddy, Thomas Reddy, Arogyam Reddy. YSR is a nasty little goonda though.
"regret why unnecessarily you came into your mother's womb"
What's with the Christism womb-anxiety anyway?
Christist seem to suffer a huge complex against anything being created (it figures of course - as they are expert at destroying what they cannot create). It shows a fearful mind at work. Explain what you cannot understand through Parthogenesis.
BTW - is this "coming into your mother's womb" really a compliment? After all the same unnecessary appearance was projected to one Jesus - was it not? He had magically appeared in a womb as well.
I can understand the anguish of Rajasekhar Reddy. There is honour among thieves that they should not expose each other. They too have their ethics. Probably AP CM feels that CB Naidu has crossed the Laxman Rekha, while trying to rxpose his (YSR’s) misdeeds. Hence the present outburst. Obviously, YSR has come to the conclusion that it is a no-holds-barred game from now on. You can’t find fault with his reasoning! Can you?
Going off on a tangent here.
Reprehensible as Samuel Reddy's comments are, C.B Naidu is only a little better. In the last 3 years that Samuel Reddy has been CM & pursuing his evangelical agenda, how many times has C.B Naidu dared to openly criticise the conversion activities os the christists, even in sacred Hindu spaces such as Tirupati, Simhachalam etc ?
Perhaps, the TDP has done this and the ELM has not reported their criticism ? Someone who monitors Telugu news media can comment on that, but it appears that C.B Naidu & company are becoming accomplices in the christist agenda for A.P by their silence.
The Telugu people are intrinsically mellow, innocent people, which the christists are exploiting with devastating effect.
Perhaps, a few Graham Staines style
incidents will wake up the people of A.P to the christist menace.
This really bad, I didn't YSR to go this low. Was he drunk or something?
http://mutiny.in/2007/07/23/a-new-low-from-the-andhra-cm/
@karyakartha92
Perhaps, a few Graham Staines style
incidents will wake up the people of A.P to the christist menace.
Christian bashing is fine, but aren't you over doing it by making such comments on a public blog?
>>Christian bashing is fine, but aren't you over doing it by making such comments on a public blog? <<
If you realize that Christians are hell bent on destroying Hindu civilization, you will know where we are coming from.
___
On another note -- Christian profanity is common place. They think of hell, devil and sin all the time. So it is a natural tendency.
Which would explain Vinay Pallekonda, YSR's outbursts.
@dear christist,
>>Christian bashing is fine, but >>aren't you over doing it by >>making such comments
No, I absolutely do not believe so.
Graham Staines violated Indian law by :
1. overstaying his tourist visa which had expired many decades ago
2. indulging in evangelical activity, that is prohibited for those on tourist visas.
3. was in possession of guns without license
4. indulged in hate propaganda against native Hindus and intimidated them into converting
to christism.
A Hindu acting similarly in a christian country would not only be deported, but crucified.
The government apparatus in Orissa
failed in it's duty to maintain law and order, forcing Shri. Dara Singh to take it in his own hands.
This is just citizen activism - why blame him for doing what the
police & government should have done ?
Samuel Reddy, the CM of AP is proving to be worse than Graham Staines (that takes some doing).
He is responsible for dynamiting several Hindu temples in A.P and forced conversions of lacs of people. He has emboldened christist missionaries to evangelise in Hindu temples, Hospitals and Jails.
Samuel Reddy, is therefore inciting
violent vigilante action by some
misguided youth, for which he will be responsible.
There are decent individuals in your community who can be better role models than YSR, people like
P.C Alexander, P.A Sangma etc.
I do not understand why self-proclaimed patriotic Indian christians should identify themselves with thugs like YSR ?
@christist,
>> I will not dispute your >>unsubstantiated claims of >>Staine's visa status
It is standard christist doctrine to deny any criminal wrongdoing on the part of your co-religionists.
These have been substantiated in a court of law, despite the attempt at intimidating the Indian judiciary by the presence of Australians in the courtroom.
I have nothing to prove to you on an internet blog.
You say it is ok for Hindus to be crucified in christian countries and in the same breath deny the right of self defense to Hindus in their own country.
The rule of law is supreme. If Indians, including Hindus are violating it, they ought to be prosecuted for it.
If Graham Staines had been prosecuted in a law court, the case would have dragged on for decades, he would have been released on bail to continue his terror and finally fined some paltry sum of Rs. 500.
Violence is regrettable, but then Hindus have no exlusive responsibility to adhere to "non-violence". Is the USA practising legal procedure, non-violence & negotiation with terrorists in Iraq & Afghanistan ? It is not and rightly so.
>>Or, is it that in your view only >>Christian criminals should be >>punished?
In response to your hollow rhetoric, I can only quote what
Swami Vivekananda, one of the greatest scholars of Hinduism said in 1894 :
"If all India stands up and takes all the mud that is at the bottom of the Indian ocean and throws it up against the Western countries, it will not be doing an infinitesimal part of that which you are doing to us."
Read it all:
http://voi.org/books/hhce/Ch13.htm
@christist,
To me, Shri Dara Singh is not a hooligan and despite all the unsubstantiated allegations against him by the John Dayal types, the prosecution has not been able to prove that Graham Staines was killed by him.
Now, granting your allegation for argument's sake: His actions are not so despicable, in that he may have been forced to take this extreme action as a last resort, frustrated by the knowledge that the legal/political system in India would actually protect Staines and persecute him.
I would acquit him honorably for his service as a "Staine remover".
You are deceiving nobody with your false claims of monopoly on charitable causes. Big deal, even the Lashkar E Tayba & Hamas 7 Hizballah claim to do such "charitable work".
True philanthropists do not advertise their work.
Hindu institutions, incidentally are doing wonderful work among the underprivileged, including among lepers. Please feel free to contact them if necessary.
They will not ask you to convert to Hinduism.
I reiterate: Graham Staines was a violent fanatic. Those who live by the sword die by it and no sympathy is due to enemies of our civilization.
It may be standard diplomatic procedure for white Australians to represent their christist soboteur in the courtroom, but similar courtesies are denied to Hindus in christian countries, when they are accused of minor crimes.
The presence of white Australians at the trial was a naked attempt to intimidate the Indian judiciary and subvert the rule of law, clearly encouraged by the presence on Indian soil, of millions of
John Dayals,Valson Thampus, Cedric Prakashs & other "Massey sahibs"
like Jos/Mathew/Christian etc.
I'm not a christist, therefore i do not condone *crucifying* anybody. Only a perverted cannibalistic christian masochist mind can ever imagine that crucifixion is some form of dispensing justice.
I neither said nor implied that "America is christianity personified". The analogy was about the adequacy/utility of adhering to non-violence & following legal procedures when combating terrorists. In my definition, Graham Staines was a terrorist. When NATO bombs terrorists in Afghanistan, they do not care about collateral damage to
potential collborators among Afghan civilians.
>>Does killing and hate have any >>place in Swamiji’s scheme of >>things
Absolutely not. And we Hindus don't need lessons in Hindusim from brainwashed christists. Unlike the idiots who converted to the evil sadomasochistic vampire cult of christism - for a bag of rice, we are well acquainted with the Roberto Nobili school of treachery.
The Swamiji certainly did not allude to the great Vedantic truth of the sameness and omnipresence with respect to christianity, whose fundamentals completely contradict that philosophy.
Christian said >>> Left to the Christians, the Iraq war would never have taken place.
Bull shit. George W Bush ran as a Christian, period. In one of his debates for Texas gubernatorial elections he named Jesus as his favorite political philosopher. It was a butt of the joke in the US for a long time.
GWB’s poodle Tony Blair was a Christian nut case. Rumors are abound that he will convert to Catholicism after demitting office.
These are the immortal words Rev. Jerry Falwell just before the war “blow them all away in the name of the Lord”. You can read the transcripts at http://cnnstudentnews.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0410/24/le.01.html
Of course you will play the usual taqquiya game and say these men are not Christians, but no takers buddy.
So don’t give this crap about Christianity and peace and love baloney. Iraq war was started, conducted and messed up by Christian nut cases all the way, no body else.
Christians and Christians only ARE responsible for the killings of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians in the Iraq war, period.
One small correction, Falwell’s words were before Afghan war, nevertheless he was a Christian happily supporting war.
@christist,
Your analogy of the Panchatantra tale is out of context here.
If at all there is any relevance, it is this :
Graham Staines was a thug, Graham Staines was a terrorist, Graham Staines was
a scoundrel who is rotting in hell for terrorising innocent people. This is God's
truth, regardless of the noisy protests by christist bigots
and dhimmi politicians who attempt to confer martyrdom on a nasty bigot.
Your repeated false assertions do not automatically make Dara Singh
a hooligan. The Wadhwa commision of inquiry has established beyond
a shred of doubt - Graham Staine's terrorism.
See this note from a recent post on this blog:
"Graham Staines & other christists are part of some diabolical conspiracy
or the other, ex: the Joshua 2000, Vision 20/20
projects, to wage demographic warfare on India, by means of aggressive proselytisation."
http://www.worldmap.org/country.php?ROG3=IN
http://worldmap.org/maps/prepared/churchstatus/india/Unengaged%20Peoples%20in%20India%20by%20pop%20and%20district.pdf
Therefore, *nobody* is conned by christist claims of philanthropy.
Even the convicts & criminals that are converted in jails, with the
assistance of scoundrels like Smauel Reddy 8 Oommen Chandy etc, eventually
see through the christist fraud and return home to the Sanatana Dharma.
Some of these criminals rape christist nuns, BTW in the zeal of
the neo-convert, and even this is used in christist propaganda by
scum like John Dayal, Dilip D'Souza, Valson Thampu etc.
What can I say about this ? Other than quote Atalji -
"There should be a national debate on conversions." Indeed.
Dara Singh's responsibilty for Staine's death is still a matter pending before the court.
The very fact that you even talk of "christian philanthropy" constitutes
an advertisement, a naked one at that.
And stop your bleating about Staine's children. Violence is regrettable -
but Staines incited this, invited this & promoted this.
Besides, no christist worth his salt, including that raving lunatic John Paul
ever apologised for the GOA inquisition, under Xavier the scoundrel, wherein
Hindu babies were burnt alive/slaughtered/crucified by the Portuguese conquistadors
to terrorise entire villages into converting. How can you indian christists defend this ?
Leave aside all quesions of faith - but do you realise that someone in some branch of *your*
family tree may have been baptized in this manner. Do you honestly feel nothing for them ?
No remorse ? No sympathy ? No sense of duty to correct the historical wrong ?
Is this the level of your indoctrination, your hatred of your own Hindu blood.
Really, tell me which white christist will donate his blood to replace the
Hindu blood flowing through your veins ? The answer is 0.
You're only denigrating & demeaning *yourself* with this christist obsession.
And, what is your obsession with
leprosy ? The Ramakrishna Mission, Arya Samaj, Mata Amritanandamayee,
Sathya Sai Institutions, RSS are involved in social work, including
among the leprosy affected. Feel free to check them out.
There are no Indians supporting Indians in a foreign land, as long as
the affected Indians are Hindus. If the Indian victims happen to be
muslims/christists - the GOI immediately gets involved.
I deliberately chose to use "crucify" because Christianity *invented*
crucifixion, historically only Christians have used it a mechanism to dispense justice,
as opposed to lethal injections, firing squads etc. Why, the christists even
*celebrate* the cruci-fiction of their own patron saint, yesu, the man who wasn't
even born - according to several christian gospels.
Hinduism is native to the larger Indic civilization, which includes
India, Afghanistan, Nepal, Cambodia, Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia etc.
Hinduism was the original religion in these areas and others, like
Persia, central asia etc. Obviously, Hindus have been subjected to genocide
by muslim invaders in most of these places and destroyed.
Hinduism is not dying. It never will - despite the best efforts of the 3M thugs.
But, Hinduism faces an existential threat from the mullah/missionary/marxist combine
in India & Nepal today. It is not paranoia. Just look at how the christist disease
ravaged South Korea to exterminate Buddhism or for that matter, in Kerala, Tamil Nadu
and Nagaland/Mizoram/Tripura/Meghalaya etc.
No Hindu "trader" went to Afhanistan etc. Afghanistan etc were of Hindu origin.
And, Hindus were taken as *indentured labourers* to Fiji, South Africa, Singapore,
the Caribbean. They did not go of their own volition. The British christists uprooted,
enslaved the Hindus from particular geographical areas, ex: Gorakhpur in eastern
U.P for revolting in the 1857 sepoy mutiny against them.
The descendants of those Hindus have been associated with their countries of
birth for many generations. This is not comparable to the italian shroud of turin,
who only acquired Indian citizenship in the early 1980's, that too out of political
expediency. Sonia has no right to rule India, unless it's your contention that
she automatically qulaifies by virtue of being white & christist.
Stop your phoney bleating (on various threads) about Indians having a slave
mentality etc. You are personally guilty of worse, i.e. ascribing to the
white man's religion is the greatest form of slavery, more so for someone
whose ancestor's converted to christianity under duress !
Talk about Massey sahibs being worse than Gunga Dins !
Hindu religious leaders visit western counties to cater to & at the invitation
of the expatriate Hindu communities of Indian origin, NOT to attack or threaten or crucify
Eueopeans/Americans/Christians or their way of life - unlike your typical
christist hatemongers like Graham Staines/Pat Robertson/Jerry Falwell/Ron Watts/Benny Hinn/
Billy Graham etc who come to India with the explicit intention of destroying Indic
religion & culture. Some of them may put up a show of "service" and "charity", but India
& the Hindus can manage without this false christist charity, i.e Thanks but NO Thanks
or Thanks for nothing.
And to - Rajeev/Kapidhwaja et al who administer this blog.
Why are we providing christist disrupters a platform to
disrupt this Hindu nationalist blog ?
We Hindus have no representation in the GOI, Indian parliament,
media or even the BJP. The blogosphere is our only tool.
I feel violated by the presence of christist disrupters
on our blog - having to expend the time & energy answering them
is a wasted effort, given their apparent incorrigible
indoctrination.
I guess the only reason "christian" isnt banned for being disruptive, is that he always causes you, kk92, to produce volumes of verbal diarhhoea which Rajeev perhaps enjoys a lot.
If he didnt enjoy all your diarhhoea, he would have banned the other guy for disruptive behaviour.
Christian said>>> I’d appreciate a creative discussion.
May be it’s time Christians drop their “creative” discussion and start a honest conversation.
@observer,
Christist denigration, demonization and vilification of Hindu nationalists, India & Hinduism itself is fine with you.
A Hindu's response to christist aggression constitutes "diarrhea".
Are you a closet christist or what.
karyakarta92,
verbal diarrhoea, as I understand it, means "talking too much".
you could check this up on the internet.
observer = six-stix = vishal.k
same old disruptive element. it keeps coming back to disrupt some more.
nizhal yoddha = "tulya nindau stutir mauni" (equally
indifferent to abuse, praise and silence)."
that is why he deleted and banned those who would not offer only praises to him all the time, and those who did original thinking.
"original thinking". bwahahahahaha. excuse me while i climb back on my chair after rolling on the floor laughing.
this is *so* appropriate that this comment from the much-aliased vishal.k should come on this thread where these idiot christists are demonstrating once again why they are brainwashed morons. we have seen innumerable instances of christist thuggishness in the recent past: godman ratzinger proclaiming that only his flavor of devil-worship is good; the devil-worshippers in the us senate disrupting a hindu prayer; and so on and so forth.
yet the christists are not one bit ashamed of their sick ideology. they want to shout about the inoffensive others who are just minding their own business.
i have been letting the christists have some rope because they will clearly hang themselves. much as pallekonda junior did. on this blog, the extremely dense 'christist', and the terminally brainwashed and frothing-at-the-mouth 'wandering jew' or something along those lines have shown how rational and logical christists are. yeah, right!
there's a famous saying in malayalam: "not content to eat all the rice, and to bite the housewife, after all this, the dog is still growling and carrying on".
how appropriate for christists, who have damaged the world more than anyone else!
how appropriate for vishal.k, who irritated even the most tolerant persons on this blog!
i do sometimes feel sorry for vishal.k, so desperate to be allowed back here, but also so obviously with a chip on the shoulder that it is impossible to consider doing that. i'd have to spend all my time deleting vishal.k's incoherence or verbal diarrhea or pointless aggression, as seen above.
vishal.k is a stealth christist. fits right in.
Post a Comment