Fwd: An eye and a life

dec 11th

sad but true.

maniappan = hindu = nobody cares, let him be decapitated
jose = christist = everybody is bothered, bring him back right now
naushad = mohammedan = everybody is bothered, clemency needed right now

clear apartheid against hindus. this is like the blood money in saudi arabia, see wikipedia (which is actually quoting me without giving me credit):

at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_money (or the Wall Street Journal, April 9, 2002):

In Saudi Arabia when a person has been killed or caused to die by another, the perpetrator has to pay blood money, or compensation, as follows:

·          100,000 riyals if the victim is a Muslim man

·          50,000 riyals if a Muslim woman

·          50,000 riyals if a Christian man

·          25,000 riyals if a Christian woman

·          6,666 riyals if a Hindu man

·          3,333 riyals if a Hindu woman

This hierarchy is based on the Islamic legal definitions of human rights and is rooted in the Quran and Sharia (Islamic law).

so mohammedans in india want sharia when it suits them, and don't want sharia when it hurts them. this is called "having the cake and eating it too". only in 'secular' india does this happen.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: R

Last month when Maniappan was kidnapped, none of our MPs including the communal minister E Ahamed were bothered. Now see the 'value' of a Muslim eye!! MLAs, MPs, ministers are getting painful 'piles' all of a sudden and they cannot sit for a moment!   Remember the enthusiasm of Chandy and C.Travancore MLAs to release another Christist - one Jose - from Iraq??   There is something really wrong with our media and politicians. Some are more than equal, while others face aparthied. ***************************************************************************************   Naushad issue echoes in Parliament

Pioneer News Service/ New Delhi Rajya Sabha members, especially from Kerala, on Wednesday demanded immediate intervention by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to save an Indian national who is facing the threat of his eye being gouged out as a punishment for injuring a Saudi national in a scuffle.

Raising the issue during Zero Hour, RSP member NK Prema Chandran said the government should take urgent steps so that Naushad could be saved from the ghastly punishment of eye-for-an-eye after a Shariat court found him guilty of blinding a Saudi three years ago.

Naushad, a native of Kerala, had worked as a shop assistant in a petrol station in Damman in Saudi Arabia. In April 2002, he allegedly wounded the left eye of a Saudi national when he tried to defend himself after the Saudi roughed him up over demanding money back for a defective battery charger sold to him.

Mr Prema Chandran was joined by several members from the state and other parties. Responding to members' concern, Minister of State for External Affairs E Ahamed said he expected Saudi authorities to respond favourably to the mercy plea.

"We hope this will come out successfully," he said adding Indian envoy had already taken up the matter with the authorities there.