Friday, July 30, 2010

What Happens After the US Withdraws?


TIME magazine's latest cover story asks the question of what would happen to Afghan women after the US withdraws from the country?

The answer to that may be hinted at by the cover image itself. Not quite a National Geographic moment, is it?

Meanwhile, the holier-than-thou "liberals" are furious at TIME for publishing such a provocative cover - mainly because it makes these "liberals" look like the moral shirkers they are. It's interesting to read some of their contrived clever-by-half crooked justifications for a US withdrawal. None of them can directly bring themselves to admit they'd be throwing Afghan women to the wolves.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

After ruining a nation and an entire region, after using Depleted Uranium and God knows what else, after murdering several marriage parties in cold blood, Time is bothered about Afghan women? Please spare me this garbage.
What goes around, comes around and it's high time the US gets what it dishes out.

sansk said...

except for economy, there is no justifiable excuse for Obama to cut and run. But, I don't think he is so much concerned with the economy.

Julian said...

What nonsense is this?

Afghan women's position hasn't seen any substantial improvement from the prewar days and has gotten worse if anything.

Having your whole family wiped out by missiles or giving birth to babies with horrific birth defects is not some great womens lib.

In any case what business is it of the US about how women in Afghanistan are treated?

In the US cuckolded husbands are in many cases forced to pay CS to kids that aren't even theirs under Lord Mansfield's law even if paternity tests show otherwise, so should someone invade the US to improve the position of men there?

Unknown said...

What else do you expect a soft porn magazine like Huff Po to say? Of course all other lib magazines ( say NYT, TIMER, Wash PO and Newsweek) will have identical garbage while trying to explain away Messiah's chicanery. Just have a hypo - If George W Bush had promised to pursue "Good War" in Afghanistan and then turned away like this what would have liberal media said?