Tuesday, July 06, 2010

more on warming

arvind
the detailed graph on this page shows there is variation: siberia and western europe had a +5 deg C change, parts of the western US had a -5 deg C. india had a +2/3 deg C change, which was noticed and commented on as temps climbed into the 40s and it was oppressive.

that it snowed somewhere is poor science, and a red herring. and you know that too!

may2010temps.gif (650�534)

in response to:

Arvind has left a new comment on your post "climate change is validated. again.":

The claim that May temperatures are warmest on record is an outright lie. The claim by NASA's Goddard Center of being "the Nth warmest on record" does not match up with their own numbers. They have also doctored their own data (you can go to the archives and you will see that the numbers have changed).

As for May, it SNOWED in several places. Their latest claim is that it doesn't matter that it was cool all over the world, all their data is from the sea which has pushed up the average! This has got to be one of the most Orwellian claims.

Global Warming like the coming Ice Age is a hoax perpetrated by non-scientists.

2 comments:

Arvind said...

As I pointed out in my post, data from NOAA and NASA are doctored. I have evidence in the form of snapshots from the same page on the Wayback Machine. The numbers keep changing to suit their press release.

NASA Goddard Center's claims about the "Nth hottest year" does not match up with their own numbers. For instance, a claim that this is the hottest year must mean that the actual published average temperature should be greater than the published average temperature for all previous years. In a bizarre twist, this is not so! Will email you the data separately.

Arvind said...

+5 deg, -5 deg and +2/3 deg change (assuming it is not fraudulent data which it is) cannot be global warming. Global Warming is supposed to change the temperature by only 0.06 degrees per year.

i've emailed you evidence that they touch up the data and then mark down the numbers again the next year when they have to prove that it is the "hottest year on record."

as for snow, it was not snow somewhere, it was snow almost every place where it normally snows in winter. that is why nasa now claims that all their temperature data is from the sea which cannot be verified by ordinary people.

looks like the carbon traders are desperate - after all al gore and goldman sachs need to make money and the carbon exchange will be based in usa. even the carbon product has been patented by the fannie mae head. so they cook up all these scenarios. what happened to ice age? did the same people not claim we are entering an ice age and india needs to pay up huge sums of money for clean stoves to prevent the next ice age?