Monday, July 05, 2010

more on the sainted ishrat jehan and her pals: the story just doesn't compute

jul 5th, 2010

why is nobody asking the obvious question? who were the pakistanis ishrat and pranesh/javed were traveling with? what visas did they hold? who gave them visas? what business did they have in india? especially what business did they hold that required them to travel with assault rifles and explosives in the car? where did they register as foreigners are required to? which police station was supposed to keep track of them? 

or, as is likely, were they illegal infiltrators?

in either case, what did an alleged perfume salesman (pranesh/javed) and his assistant (ishrat) have to do with these guys? why were there no perfume samples in the car? what perfumes had they sold in the past? what did the weapons in the car have to do with their perfume sales? what legitimate business did ishrat and pranesh/javed have with the paks? where are the books of the alleged perfume business? its income tax records?

and why is this gopinath pillai (father of pranesh/javed) making such a fuss? normally malayali hindus are extremely embarrassed about their children being terrorists or converting to mohammedanism, and they typically disown them. it is likely that gopinath pillai's demands for a CBI inquiry and so forth are fueled by petro dollars and by the fanatic mohammedans of kerala -- it is highly unlikely that it is he who wants to delve into the matter of his convert son's death. anyway, what answer does gopinath pillai have to the question of what his son was doing with a couple of pakistani terrorists?

what does sajida, wife of pranesh/javed, and her kids, have to say about all this? has someone taken evidence from them and their statements about the relationship of ishrat jehan to their husband/father? 

how about a lie-detector test for ishrat's mother and gopinath pillai? how about the court throwing out their cases for frivolity and hitting them with a hefty fine for wasting its time?

it sounds like, from the headley statement, that ishrat was being prepared to do a dhanu-type suicide bombing act on modi. 

let us note that the entire ELM, which jumped up and down about sweet innocent college-girl ishrat's alleged human rights, is very very very quiet now. just goes to show that most of those characters are funded by the ISI and the LeT. (or, to be charitable, terrorized by them).

No comments: