Washington Post says Mohammedans are India's "new untouchables"

It is based on some pretty silly logic and highly suspect statistics, for example
an allegedly higher proportion of Mohammedans incarcerated in Indian prisons. Even if that were true, has it occurred to the Mohammedan columnist (some woman called "Asra Nomani" )that it just might be due to their propensity to riot violently at a minute's notice? She is aggrieved by the failure of some Mohammedan women in Tamil Nadu to build a mosque for women and laments the denial of a funding proposal by the New York-based Global Fund for Women. So, if Mohammedans treat their women like cattle with no right to enter mosques even for Mohammedan prayers, that means Hindu India is discriminating against them!!! And if those Mohammedan women then request some American organisation for funding and are denied, Hindu India is treating them like untouchables!!! She's never heard of the Haj subsidy to the tune of INR 800 crores, Shikhandi Manmohan Singh's gift of $700 million of Indian taxpayer monies to the wretched Pakis OR the diversion of Hindu temple endowment assets by the UPA dhimmis to subsidize those terror factories called "Madarsas". Is GOI expected to construct separate mosques for Mohammedan women, in addition to those "Madarsas" at a cost to the state exchequer? That's right - the Atlanticists want to browbeat India on the question of alleged Mohammedan persecution to divert attention from their wars in Iraq, Afghanistan etc. This is the same strategy of Atlanticist bleating about alleged human rights violations by the Russians in Chechnya or the Serbs in Bosnia/Kosovo. The Atlanticists have not learnt anything from their absurd mollycoddling of the Afghan Mujahideen in their Jihad against the Soviet Union......