Thursday, November 08, 2007
CPI(M) 'recaptures' Nandigram bases
A glimpse of state sponsored terrorism by fascist CPI(M) thugs in Stalinist West Bengal, all for the sake of an investment in a private business by foreign capitalists. Shouldn't Bengal be a peasants and workers paradise under the communists? Since Nandigram happens to be dominated by Mohammedans, the communists will predictably camouflage action on that front with a big show on the Rizwan-ur suicide case and for Mohammedan reservations under the Sachar report. Meanwhile, politburo chief Prakash Karat fresh from a Comintern meeting to commemorate 90 years of revolution in the Stalinist fatherland calls Bush a fool !!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
hi karyakarta,
whatz with naxals in this RoP dominated area? whatever happens naxals r sure bad news.
The Maowadis would like to prove that they are the true communists
as opposed to the CPI(M) neocapitalist counter-revolutionaries.
It is a hilarious spectacle like the competitive Mohammedan fundamentalism of Madani's PDF and E. Ahamed's Muslim league in Kerala. In contrast to the gentle
treatment afforded in benevolent Gujarat, Medha Patkar was beaten by CPI(M) goons in Stalinist West Bengal. The dhimmi Indian media will mimimise the incident, because it is politically inconvenient to expose the true fascist face of Indian communism. Medha Patkar herself will be less voluble in her protests compared to her performance in Gujarat last year.
Rajeev and others,
Firstly Wish you all a Happy Diwali/Deepawali.
Regarding the Rizwanur affair, I saw this peculiar 'secular' thing in the papers, which I had seen/heard before but came to fore during this event.
The media was labelling it as inter-caste marriage.
Instead of saying it as inter-religious, they are using this mis-guiding term.
Even in a radio program some months back, the half-literate 'RJ' was saying some 'inter-caste' marriage and the guy turned to be a you know who - Mohemmadan.
And taking this confusing term, the media is playing tricks... they know that even the non-staunch hindus would oppose inter-religious marriage, they are using the confusing term. For ex. in Deccan Chronicle, they were asking opinion about inter-caste marriage and they cited this idiotic event as example.
Also, they are indirectly showing, look Hindus are opposing inter-caste marriage, this event is an example.. blah blah...
This misguiding term is similar to 'secular' terms like 'south asian'...
i was imagining if such a thing happened in gujarat what would be the media reaction ?
Where are these conscience keepers who come from nowhere and jump into the band wagan to bash BJP ?
Why dont they ask questions like Is buddhadeb the real modern day nero ?
The Naxals and CPM aren't at war. The maovadis are to CPM what Taliban is to ISI. A CPM cadre gets bumped off now and then but it is due to local level political rivalries. You don't need eagle eyes to see the nexus between naxalites and CPM.
Post a Comment