http://www.economist.com/world/asia/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9725391: "India's Muslims have long suffered politically inspired communal violence and casual discrimination."
Really? can Islamic folks in Bradford marry four girls concurrently ? they can in India.
Or here is another one - does Britain subsidize Islamic "educational" institutions? India does - Under Article 30. Or how about the Haj subsidy? - right they pay that in Britain by showing Lawrence of Arabia during Ramzan.
Actually - if only you took your head out of your ass - Economist man - you would notice that it is the Hindus in India that suffer religiously inspired (as opposed to politically inspired) communal violence and legal (as opposed to casual) discrimination.
And yes - we would have a problem on our hands were the Hindus to get riled - and yes - you would feel the ripple effect in "England's green and pleasant land"
3 comments:
India would have a serious problem? Every idiot is mouthing the same lines. 'Dont piss us off or India will suffer', as if they have got mass invitations from abroad to blast India and get away spitting and cursing it.
If you blast bombs, ruin places, create fear, that is the world you are creating for yourself. India does not belong to anyone, not constitutionally discriminated agaisnt upper castes, not 'oppressed', permanently angry low castes, not 'hurt' minorities (sikh, muslim, christian), not the uber-successful south indians(last heard the 4 states were being asked to join the european union, ), not the angry kashmiris and north-easterers, not even to the big time leaders. So basically it does not belong to anyone, and everone seems to think there are some people in this India who are really really worried about their rage. Well there are none. So blast as many bombs as you can, I am sure your the name of your head is written on one of hem
What's that you have against us South Indians?
Post a Comment