amnesty bestirs itself about nandigram

mar 16th, 2007

i am amazed amnesty says some bad things about the marxists. why, what happened? is it because some of the nandigram dead are, gasp, mohammedans ? i havent seen a list of the names of the dead, but since the original protests in nandigram were organized by some mohammedan group, i am making this conjecture.

this would make it most interesting: a red-green clash?

http://www.amnestyusa.org/news/document.do?id=ENGASA200082007

despite my cynicism and feeling that this sort of thing is the hallmark of the marxists -- they are fascists to the core -- i find the parallels compelling:

1. tiananmen where unarmed protesters were killed by chinese communist troops
2. the odessa steps sequence from the film 'battleship potemkin' (widely considered the greatest film of all time), which shows how the russian revolution began

ironic, isn't it: the self-proclaimed champions of the common man massacring the common man with malice aforethought and an army of 4,000 including cadres?