Terror has no religion

nov 11th, 2008

yes, that's true. there are hindu terrorists too, brinda dear. so why
should you be surprised? or did you think mohammedans, christists and
communists were the only people who had some divine right to be
terrorists? sort of like some godman divided up the world between the
portuguese and the spanish in medieval times?

hindu terrorist is the term in communist terminology for nationalists.
you know that the communists have a hilarious lexicon which sounds
like english but isn't. (much like mohammedans do. in their lexicon,
"innocent' == mohammedan non-combatant; non-mohammedans are by
definition not innocent.)

some more examples from the communist lexicon and their translations
(anybody remember the film 'airplane' where they provided subtitles
for black lingo? eg. 'shit' -> golly)

people's republic == dictatorship by communist appartchiks
people's liberation == a looting and pillaging communist army wipes
out your country
comrade == (if female) woman you can forcibly have sex with
nationalism == patriotic fervor for china
social justice == communists oppressing poor peasants and raping their daughters
equality == communists shoot you, take your money and share it equally
among themselves
hindu terrorist == someone who cares for india
oppressed minority person == mohammedan with RDX or christist with AK-47
terror has no religion == mohammedan and christist terrorists killing hindus
pogrom == hindus killing mohammedan and christist terrorists

feel free to supply more examples of the communist lexicon. heck, we
should provide this glossary along with the 'hindu' and 'frontline' so
that people can actually understand what the comrades are saying.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Swami

Prof. Dr. Hilda Raja was a sociology professor at Stella Maris College
in Chennai, her husband a professor at Loyola College. They are Roman
Catholics by faith and are now stationed in Vadodara in Gujarat. They
are the best friends Hindus could have today. Her commentary is
usually quite good. Pls. circulate.

SDS

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: hilda raja <pachake@yahoo.com>
Date: 2008/11/11
Subject: Terror has no religion
To:

Terror has no religion' (TOI Nov 11th) by Brinda Karat who is looking
through her spectacles which is tinted red. Let me use her logic to
disprove her. The aggressive defense by the CPM to a select group of
terror outfits is well known. Direct and/or indirect abetment of
terrorism has been obvious in the States ruled by the CPM. The maximum
terror groups are in the North East States. Figures compiled by S.
Asia Terrorism portal lists a staggering 174 terror, insurgent and
extremist groups operating in India most of them in the North
East.with Manipur-40 Assam 36, Tirupura-30 etc. People's war group and
the Communist Party of India-Maoist are also terror groups. The Nano
car project which triggered protests in West Bengal saw the CPM cadres
run amuck killing and raping the poor farmers and farm women. Brinda
Karat did not raise her voice in protest against the shedding of
innocent blood and the violation of women. This is not something
new-it has
always been the case when justice is demanded by politicians they are
selective and their vision of justice is blurred. To give an example-
In the case of the demolition of one and a half domes in Babri Masjid
the CPM and its affiliated Women's Democratic Wing rose as one man
throughout the country to condemn and demanded the banning of
Hindutva outfits. It must be noted that not a single Muslim life was
lost in that demolition. Year after year the Babri Majid is brought to
centre stage for protests and condemnation by politicians to serve
their narrow vested interest. The vengeance of this demolition was the
bomb blasts in Mumbai in 1993 which killed more than 300 mostly Hindus
and hundreds injured. Did the victims get justice? And as the author
stated from 2004-2008 there has been at least 25 major bomb blasts in
which 717 people were killed and hundreds injured. It is not only the
soft policy of the UPA but also the government is guilty of
abdication of its duty. The CPM which had lend its support to the UPA
government should also share this guilt. The repeal of POTA gave an
impetus to the sudden spawning of terror groups. The tardy
investigation and the soft policy made the terror groups bold. Afzal
Guru's case is a typical example on the government's weakness to bring
to justice terrorists. It is wrong to state that a small section of
Indian Muslim youth is drawn into the new work of terror groups
because the State had failed to ensure justice to the victims of
communal attacks and to punish the guilty of various crimes against
the minorities. The very premise of this argument is flawed because
most of the victims of the communal attacks are Hindus-.if Brinda
Karat has the Gujarat riots in mind then by an extension of her
argument it is the failure of the government and all political parties
including the CPM to even condemn the Godra carnage that triggered the
Gujarat riots. If Sar
Sevaks can be roasted in locked carriages and their burning flesh
does not stir the conscience of the politicians is it small wonder
that there would be a backlash? Year after year the Gujarat riots come
in handy to bash Modi, the BJP and to whip up communalism. Justice is
blind-it does not look at the religion of the perpetrators nor the
victims. The author' mindset is revealed when she calls for justice to
the victims of the minorities. Can there be justice for the minorities
and no justice for the majority? It must be conceded that most of the
terror outfits are Islamic. When Sadhvi has been grilled and put to
narco analysis and brain mapping-when chemicals are injected into her
body not once but many times Brinda and her party which raises issues
against the discrimination of women were silent. Should not the
process of interrogation and probing be the same? Or does it mean that
the appeasement policy of the Muslims includes this area too? When
the cops pick up Muslims for questioning all hell is raised that a
minority community is being harassed and hounded. Can the cops just
walk in and pick up the suspects without questioning others? And where
are the suspects holed but within the Muslim communities? Cabinet
ministers rushed to issue certificates of innocence to SIMI-a banned
outfit and to those terror suspects picked up in the Batla House raid.
The investigators are hindered and hampered at every stage till
finally the whole investigation is put in cold storage. What is the
justice Brinda Karat is talking of? To put it in a nut shell the
Muslims can get away with any number of bomb blasts and crimes-but a
single bomb blast in which the Hindus are suspects all hell is let
loose. With the Malegoan case the color of terror became saffron and
the outcry to ban all the Hindutva outfits became shrill. But when all
the suspects were Muslims in nearly the 20 and odd major serial blasts
then we
are told that terror has no religion. From where does Jihadis emerge?
What ideology inspires them? Who supports them? We have yet to know
what the PM has done towards the extradition of Dawood Ibrahmin. The
Prime Minister disclosed that he spent a sleepless night when Haneef
was arrested in Australia. One wonders if he would lose his sleep had
it been a Hariram. This is the whole problem with our
politicians-their perception and the way they make the system work.
Minority votes must be garnered at all cost -does not matter if it is
through the 'confluence of the blood of innocents'.
Dr Mrs Hilda Raja,
Vasna Road,Vadodara-15

Get an email ID as yourname@ymail.com or yourname@rocketmail.com.
Click here http://in.promos.yahoo.com/address