nov 27th, 2008
the reports mention that the terrorists let an italian guy go while herding together the brits and yanks as hostages.
this is quite interesting.
we have been saying here that there is apparently a tacit 'understanding' between sonia nehru and the mohammedans: "you leave me and my kingini kuttan alone, and you can do whatever you want to the hindus of this country".
it is believed that this sort of thing is acceptable under mohammedan tactics -- you live somewhere in a non-mohdan state, but you don't attack that state because you have an understanding. you just use your domicile there to attack others. this is what the whole 'londonistan' deal is between the slimeys and the mohammedans (although that is now beginning to break down). they lived there, didn't attack limeys, but used it as a safe haven.
in india, the 'understanding' is more narrow. it has been "we will live in india, and we won't attack sonia and kingini, or any of the other kkkangress and upa bigwigs like arjun or karunanidhi, but we'll kill anybody else in india, especially hindus, that we please". this has been their understanding for some time.
now it looks as though it has been slightly amended: "we won't attack sonia and kingini, or any other italians, or any of the other kkkangress and upa bigwigs".
who said terrorists aren't flexible? they have to be.
1 comment:
Yeah, rather curious "coincidence" that. Also, the elimination of ATS hawaldar Hemant Kurkure. The ATS third degree torture of Hindu religious figures and it's diabolical propaganda against Hindu nationalist organisations had become increasingly bizarre, even by Kaangreess sycophant standards. It's like the Kaangress dirty tricks department had gone haywire. Kurkure was becoming a liability for the Kaangress thugs -because as the implementing stooge - he knew too much. Therefore, he might have been bumped off by the Jihadis at the behest of their Kaangress allies to prevent any inconvenient disclosures in the future.
Post a Comment