nov 19th, 2008
if it had been james astill (atlanticist india stringer) writing this, he would have complained that some mohammedan somali pirates were brutally killed by the evil hindoos. i guess the east africa correspondent is less of a bigot.
all this reminds me of the barbary pirates, operating from north africa, who were the bane of shipping the in 18th cent CE. they used to capture passenger ships and would take the females for ahem... "spiritual nourishment purposes" (copyright john thattunkal, vampire, er..., bishop of cochin), ransom the guys, and keep the looted goods. the white guys including the newly-independent americans had to go after them and attack them in tripoli and whatnot.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbary_Pirates
the interesting thing is that the barbary pirates were, and the somali pirates are, mohammedans. believing ones.
but nobody wants to say this out loud. i mean, after all, since one mohammedan == 10 hindoos (copyright pakistani army), how can one indian naval ship sink a pirate ship?
2 comments:
Actually piracy, and generally speaking banditry (known as razzia), against non-believers, aka kaffir, is part and parcel of Islamic theology. Non-believers are permitted the option to buy a licence by paying jiziya and so avoid getting robbed. Of course only solution which works is to eliminate such vermin so they can enjoy their afterlife in jannat!
I am worried now Pakistan will now create the pirates and then they themselves shoot them and capture 10 ships..(to have equal power show like they have done Nuclear tests).... why because 1 mohamedean = 10 hindoos...(copy right) Pakistan army... (super) Iliked it and also the vampire john tattungal's copyright. spiritual purposes.. wooooo what a copyright!
Post a Comment