Re: christists and the great service they do

jan 10th

didnt go through the first time i sent it.

On 1/10/06, Rajeev Srinivasan <rajeev.srinivasan@gmail.com > wrote:

jan 10th

some semi-literate christist idiot kid wrote on this blog that we hindus should be grateful for white guys coming to india, giving up their cushy lives, and doing 'social service' for us. siva gave an excellent response, and i want to add to that. the kid is an obvious idiot, but i am taking the trouble to write this because this is part of the propaganda all christists are force fed in their indoctrination centers.

this is standard christist bullshit and christists are programmed to bleat this out. my response:

if these people are *so* intent on doing social service, how come none of them are in spanish harlem doing 'social service'? is it because the sick, obese, desperately poor people living there have already been 'saved'? in other words, once they have successfully converted somebody, then they are on their own, and the missionaries can move on to fresh meat.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/10/nyregion/nyregionspecial5/10diabetes.html?th=&adxnnl=1&emc=th&adxnnlx=1136895696-9Dc0YryekQeoO3DqoDHKUA&pagewanted=all

also, how come the great white missionaries who want to do all this service do not go to:

a. the bronx
b. new orleans
c. the philippines
d. bangladesh
e. pakistan

etc. where there are plenty of poor people?

answer: they'd get their *****s cut off by mohammedans, that's why, the piss-ant cowards. as for the bronx or new orleans, why, the people are *black*, so how could good white christists be there being polluted by the presence of actual black people? they are the sons of ham, who are meant to be enslaved by the sons of shem (ie semitic whites), right?

if they are *so* worried about us poor indians, they can just send some large checks here, they don't need to stir out of their cushy lives.

other standard christist bleats echoed by the idiot kid:

1. brahmins are bad because they put lead in the ears of non-brahmins who hear the vedas. ok, kid, provide *one* single instance when this happened. you can't because there aren't any. the manusmriti which says, rather metaphorically, that this punishment should be carried out, is not an idol that we worship, unlike your book you worship in blind faith. you indulge in bibliotary, idolatry of a book.

on the other hand, i can provide many incidents where christist priests and ordinary christists massacred lots of people who they thought were inferior: (tens of millions of people, in fact)

a. rwanda, where catholic bishops and nuns provided petrol to hutus to burn alive tutsis
b. germany, where christists gassed and otherwise exterminated jews, gypsies, et al
c. apartheid, where white christists massacred black christists
d. slavery, ditto
e. crusades, where christists massacred mohammedans (and vice versa) 

f. genocides of native americans in north and south america
g. genocides of aborigines in australia, tasmania and new zealand
h. 30 million indians killed in famines around 1890, 5 million killed in 1945's bengal famine

these are all proven and well documented. no question of their historical veracity. when you guys have finished atoning for these sins, you can start having a dialog with us about our sins, okay?

2. the little creep exhibits his casteism, which is endemic among christists and marxists. christists are terrified of brahmins and caste, because these are the two that have enabled hinduism to survive.

christists are scared of brahmins because they memorized the scriptures, so they are perfectly preserved. on the other hand, the christist book is totally messed up because every passing semi-literate medieval baboon who copied it made mistakes, and felt free to add his own editorial comments to it. the bible is absolutely not the word of god, or if it is, it is one heck of a confused/stupid god, the GOF as i once called it. for instance, just take one example of the total contradictions about the alleged birth of young jesus. mathew says only wise men came, luke says only shepherds came. mathew says herod sent troops to kill children and joseph took jc and mama mary right away to egypt. luke says a month after jc was born they performed a sacrifice, responded to a census and went to nazareth. so which version do you believe? both cannot simultaneously be true. the bible is riddled with such stupid inconsistencies, so it is hardly divine and infallible. it was written by paul and embroidered by everybody who was literate in those parts (which was about 5% of the population). my hat off to paul, who manufactured the biggest hoax in human history.

but the hindu scriptures are intact and perfectly passed on by a strict oral tradition. not a syllable has been changed in 5000 years and this is to the credit of the brahmins.

second target is caste. caste is what enabled hinduism to survive when mohammedanism was able to wipe out buddhism so easily. caste meant that hinduism was very distributed, and each person owed allegiance to his caste. thus it was impossible to wipe out all castes. so there was no center to attack (unlike the buddha viharas). it's like a distributed computer system is much more robust to attack. the local server nodes in the system are the castes, so that people maintained allegiance to a particular caste regardless of whether the barbarians had control of varanasi or mathura. the system was more fault-tolerant.

christists and marxists attack both caste and brahmins because destroying both is the way to destroy hinduism. no wonder all christists are taught in their indoctrination cells (sleeper cells?) to hate brahmins and caste.

3. the great service christists have done for india. yeah, right. they took $10 trillion from india and gave us poverty, famine and killed 30 million indians. read mike davis, 'late victorian holocausts'. he's a marxist author, so what he says must be true, no?

they destroyed india's prosperity by destroying the economy and the irrigation systems. they destroyed india's village schools. they burned palm leaf manuscripts on ayurveda. they created a class of brainwashed and uprooted idiots. they turned a prosperous country into a ruin. india in 1750: the richest country in the world, with 25% of the world's GDP. christist england: poor country with 2% of world GDP. in 100 years, the situation is reversed. this is the service christists did for india.

the only service christists have done and are doing in india: the destruction of the rainforest. because they want india to be just like their 'holy land', the horrible desert.

and here's what the alleged christ (he who didn't exist and is a figment of paul's imagination) is alleged to have said (in the book allegedly written by god):

  "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not so send
peace, but a sword.
     "For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the
daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in
law.
     "And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
 - Matthew 10:34-36.


this is a divine sentiment?

and how is this at all different from the mohammendan's "kill the idolaters wherever you find them"?

there is no difference at all between christism and mohammedanism. christists have better press relations and propaganda, that's all. they market their stuff better than the more straightforward mohammedans who say, 'convert or we'll cut your head off'. christists smile and stab you in the back, that is the only difference.