Saturday, January 14, 2006

british mohammedan preacher's vision

jan 13th

note the clarity on killing kafirs:

"[a mohammedan] can kill a kafir for any reason, and [a mohammedan] can kill a kafir for no reason".

the reverse also seems to apply, according to bush and rumsfeld and company.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/01/12/nhamz12.xml&sSheet=/portal/2006/01/12/ixportaltop.html

excerpts:

He said: "Killing the kafir for any reason is OK, killing the kafir for no reason is OK," and he specifically singled out those that granted licences for "wine shops".

Hamza added: "We like blood and are addicted to it. When they say they love Allah they must ask themselves how much fafir blood they have spilt for Allah."

Describing non-believers as "germs and viruses" in another tape he added: "There is no drop of liquid loved by Allah more than blood of Serbs, Jews or any other enemy of Allah."

In a speech about a terrorist attack in Egypt, which killed 58 people in November 1997, Hamza told his audience the tourist industry should be Islamised and added: "While children should not be killed directly, their killing is permissible if they are in the target area."

Asked if suicide bombing was permissible he said: "People call it suicide to put people off. It is not called suicide, it is called martyrdom."


3 comments:

kautilya said...

"Film-maker" Mahesh Bhatt is making a movie on jihadis and how they are forced to become jehadis. According to Mr. Bhatt, Islam is a very peaceful religion and it is misunderstood by the general public. Bhatt wants us to show how the governments and system force these poor and innocent muslims to take up arms.

In the meantime our very own innocent muslim victim Mr. Abu Salem is having a ball out there. He is changing his statements every day and making a mockery of all this investigation or whatever it is.(He should have been bumped off at the airport itself instead of spending millions of investigation)
Soon we will have messrs Kuldeep Nayar, Praful Bidwai, Shabana Azmi, Barkha Dutt, Vir Sanghvi, Vinod Mehta, Teesta (oof even that name is so irritating !) pleading with the More-than-ready to oblige UPA governemt to release him on grounds of human rights.
Before we know Abu Salem will be cutting ribbons of showrooms and malls and who knows even fight elections.

Nizhal Yoddha, you might want to add another algorithm to your library..

1] Kill hundreds
2] Involve in gang wars,hit-and-run,ransom etc
3] Join forces with neighbours
4]Leave the country
5] Convert your Hindu girlfriend to Islam and screw around for years
6] Return back to the country
7] Speak to the media and tell them that the "Hindu" police is torturing
you and leave the rest to Kuldeep Nayar and Co
8] Enjoy your moment of glory or return to step 4]

indusAquarius said...

This Mahesh Bhatt is among the bigwigs of the Sickular brigade. Which should be fine since the guy is practically a muslim anyway. All muslims are, ispo facto, either Indian Seculars or fundamentalists.

Bollywood actor Emran Hashmi (guy who acted in Murder) is his nephew or some close relation.

Also, I remember Bhatt's film 'Zakhm' (at the time I really liked it). Notice how the movie portrays the Hindu mother-in-law as the root of all evil (who denies her son from marrying a Muslim woman - Pooja Bhat).

In reality, the moment a muslim woman decides to get involved with a hindu (or any other non-muslim) male, the mullahs or even her male relatives will literally chop her legs off so she can't go out of her house.

Hindus generally will oppose initially it but eventually will reconcile.

indusAquarius said...

I totally agree with DarkStorm. It would be a big mistake to think that a Hindu man marrying a muslim woman would 'win her over' to Hinduism. The results will be quite to the contrary. I think the same thing is true with christians as well (while this rule may not apply to most European and some American christians, Indian neo-christians will never revert back to Hinduism after matrimony, irrespective of whether the christian is the bride or the groom).

I've heard of cases where a lot of christian women in India are indoctrinated by the missionaries on how to go about converting Hindu males to christianity through matrimony.

Also, history is replete with examples where Hindu princes/kings have married muslim women and converted to Islam (leading to their kingdoms/territories becoming Dar-ul-islam). One such example that had serious consequences was the Hindu king of Malaysia becoming a muslim on marrying a muslim princess. Thereby, making Malaysia a muslim country and paving way for islamization of Malaysia.

Religions of the desert have really exploited to the hilt, the Hindu concept of there being multiple true paths to God.

Also, it's not that it was all in the past and is not happening anymore, it's just that our media doesn't cover it and considers it a taboo subject.