white guy worries about his civilization disappearing. i have no idea who he is, but he sounds like a bushie-type.
he *should* worry about his civilization disappearing. the barbarians are within and without. the barbarians within include the marxists and the moral relativists.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: S
Subject: It's the demography, stupid
One obstacle to doing that is the fact that, in the typical election campaign in your advanced industrial democracy, the political platforms of at least one party in the United States and pretty much all parties in the rest of the west are largely about what one would call the secondary impulses of society—government health care, government day care (which Canada's thinking of introducing), government paternity leave (which Britain's just introduced). We've prioritized the secondary impulse over the primary ones: national defense, family, faith, and, most basic of all, reproductive activity—"Go forth and multiply," because if you don't you won't be able to afford all those secondary-impulse issues, like cradle-to-grave welfare. Americans sometimes don't understand how far gone most of the rest of the developed world is down this path: In the Canadian and most Continental cabinets, the defense ministry is somewhere an ambitious politician passes through on his way up to important jobs like the health department. I don't think Don Rumsfeld would regard it as a promotion if he were moved to Health & Human Services.
...http://www.newcriterion.com/archives/24/01/its-the-demography/
5 comments:
Dear Mr. Rajeev,
I bit off topic to this post...
Recently I came across this website, which gives clear evidence that the Taj Mahal was in reality a Hindu Shiva Temple, built by Raja Jai Singh (what some knowledgable people have been saying since long). I am sure you already know all this.
Tejo-Mahalaya (called Taj Mahal later), was appropriated & taken over by the Mughals (Shah Jahan) from Jai Singh. They destroyed whatever they could of the Hindu symbols & statues of deities and the insult upon injury is that it was then used as a burial ground.
The point is not just that it was confiscated & desecrated by the Mughals, but its Hindu reality has been completely whitewashed by the Shah Jahan-Mumtaz Mahal concoction. First by the Mughals themselves, then by the British (who always sought to pit Hindus and Muslims against each other...making sure to keep the resentment burning), later by the pseudo-secular Indira Gandhi (who banned the book by Mr. Oak who sought to bring the truth in the open & threatened to prosecute the publisher). This is where the matter stands to this day. Thankfully today we have the internet, which is an open source.
Here is ample proof of it's being a Hindu temple and of the Shah Jahan-Mumtaz Mahal story being that what it is...a story.
http://www.stephen-knapp.com/was_the_taj_mahal_a_vedic_temple.htm
(photos are at the end of the page, check the various informative links on the page too)
Please check out ALL the photos & their description on that page....the most damning evidence against Taj Mahal being built by Shahajahan is the close up of the pinnacle on top of the Taj (photo#5), which very clearly shows the Hindu kalash, mango leaves & coconut (exactly like the one used in Hindu religious ceremonies). The Arabic 'Allah' is etched on it (obviously by the Mughals) !
Do you think the Mughal LIE of the Taj Mahal should still be repeated and propagated ? How can we make the ASI (according to the weblink, the ASI knows this...)reveal the details & declare the truth on this ?
Regards,
Sonali
Sorry About the OT:
Jammu is the Hindu majority region of Jammu and Kashmir. Naturally the idea of 'Azadi' is completely alien to this region. Moreover, it is a very patriotic region (with Dogras always willing to sacrifice their lives for the cause of India and also forming one of the most valiant and decorated Regiments in the Indian Army).
Kashmiris (that is the ones currently occupying Kashmir, not the Pandits who have been driven out) are the scourge of India.
The below article appeared in a Srinagar based newspaper. The scum has the tenacity of suggesting that "Jammu sounds receptive to Azadi slogan".
I hope Rajeev you mention this in one of your Rediff article just to raise some voice about this.
Also, the scum calls Shiv Sena a "Hindu extremist outfit". Good one this, coming from the mouth of a Kashmiri Muslim!
http://www.greaterkashmir.com/full_story.asp?ItemID=14008&cat=1
Not necessarily. There are some fundamentals we theoritically agree upon such as cow slaughter.
But in some cases you are right: a person's Dharma depends on his Varna and Ashrama.
Rajiv,
Your opinion of Steyn was pretty much on the mark
Mark Steyn is a very popular on blogs. I like his writing style. Here is a sample of his writing style
Media utters nonsense, won't call enemy out
http://commonsensewonder.com/mtarchives/008493.shtml
There is some criticism of him as being a neo-con from a traditional conservative perspective
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/004823.html
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/004833.html
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/004847.html
The guy who writes VFR has some very good posts on India - You will like his posts on India
The anti-national liberalism at the core of Indian national identity
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/003861.html
India and Pakistan: why the mass killings occurred
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/003862.html
Jihad in India
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/003872.html
The Bushite response to terror in India
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/004433.html
If you liked his views about India - here is a sample of his views on Islam
Islam as a computer program for world conquest
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/004636.html
Mr S
Are you the same person who anchors news show on NDTV. If you are, you are doing a fantasitc job.
Could you create a profile link on the main page of your blog and write a bit about yourself.
Thanks
Post a Comment