Saturday, October 11, 2008

hindu temple denied permit: imagine if christists were denied permission to set up a church in india

oct 11th, 2008

there would be queries from the godman himself and bush and sarkozy.

see -- this is the christist ummah in action.

in any case, the point is moot, because the christists just take the land and claim it is theirs. just like that. 'saint' k m mani, a politician, has been the point man for this in kerala -- he has been revenue minister in every christist govt (i mean kkkangress govt) and he happily gives away public land to the christists.

so here are the famously secular yanks denying hindus freedom of worship. even though there is a mormon church in the same neighborhood, in fact across the street. these christist ummah-types, just like mohammedans, do not believe anybody else has a right to worship anything other than their cruel god.

http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/2008/10/11/20081011cr-nohindu1011.html

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

This is truely pathetic

Tranquil said...

http://newstodaynet.com/col.php?section=20&catid=30

T.R.Jawahar's
'Spare the ‘sinners’!
is not to be missed at all.

Excerpts:

" under lofty labels like Inculturation or Indigenisation for what is essentially impersonation....

There is also this familiar argument that it is the rigid and oppressive caste system that feeds the evangelists and fetches them the converts. Well, the other side is not greener either. Sample this letter to the editor written by a Dalit woman and published in a super secular newspaper over a decade back: ‘Anyone who is aware of the rural social scenario will agree with me that Dalit Christians get the same treatment as Hindu Dalits. Adding salt to injury, they are also looked down upon in their own religion ... Is it proper that few upper caste communities corner all the benefits under the pretext of minority rights and corner power? Is it proper to seek funds from abroad under the guise of evangelism and social uplift by selling Dalits’ shame and helplessness in the West? Is it proper to attach caste surnames to their Christian names and identify more with caste than Christ? ...’ The litany of woes is long!

I would not want someone, whose own house is in disorder, to try and set my house in order. Particularly when his motive is to benefit from my disarray, like that proverbial monkey and two cats.

My own instinctive revulsion to conversion, be it individual or mass and be it owing to conviction, for convenience or for cash, stands undiminished. I have my grouses with my god, but I find no reason to shift loyalties, certainly not for better material prospects. My understanding of religion precludes that. Religion is premised on the existence of a higher power and guides one in realising and understanding it. It is an intensely personal affair ... Nor is my God worried either. He is not jealous but self-confident enough to say that ‘in whatever form you worship me, I will be there’. If still one loses faith in that higher power, one can become an atheist at best,.... Also religion being a personal pursuit of truth it cannot be held accountable for the State’s failures on the social and economic front, as well as one’s own follies. Again, for one to lose faith and reject, he should have studied his religion first. And for him to embrace another, he should have studied that too. How many have that mental faculty? Is one lifetime enough to fathom the Vedas and the Bible? Indeed, most, if not all conversions are knee-jerk!

Let me assure critics, I am not alone in this, er., communal outlook. Conversion is resented by most, though they may not say so out of courtesy. But that courtesy should not be mistaken for consent.The provocations are dire, the hurt is deep and the repurcussions could be damning. Hindus have been slapped on both cheeks and have no more cheek to spare. In fact, it is time conversion too is added to the list of sins that the Vatican releases from time to time. For, instead of loving, it hurts ‘thy neighbour’ who loves his own God!

blogger said...

Sick! What reactions can we expect from Bharatiya politicians. When Manmoron Singh started his tainted (mis)trust vote with Gurbani it is secular, but they would have ripped Advani ji's clothes if he would have quoted God Shri Krishn from holy Geeta.

V said...

I was present at the proceedings of the court in Chandler, AZ. You should have heard what the 'locals' say about having a place of worship in their neighborhood! There we 60-70 year olds equating it to a Burger King, McDonald's, a Gas Station, a Mosque, a commercial centre, business and what not.

The court cleared all obstacles like traffic problems, parking space, architecture, land value worries etc but these 'God-fearing' neighbors again went to court with some zonal enforcements and forced this outcome.

Well its difficult to hope for a temple in the middle of a 'truly Christian' community.