Bollywood dhimmis romanticising historical record of Mohammedan demographic warfare

As if the perverted negationism perfected into a fine art by "eminent historians" of the JNU pseudo-liberal school were not enough, Bollywood dhimmis are trying their hand at celebrating the Mughal butcher Akbar, the poster boy for India's perverted Nehruvian Stalinist "secularism". To these sick dhimmis, a Rajput woman forced under duress to convert to the binary death cult from Arabia and serve as a concubine in the Mohammedan baby producing factory is the most exalted example of "secularism", the illegitimate Mohammedan progeny born out of such forced relationships the greatest living examples of "Composite Culture"(Or "Ganga-Jamuni Tahzeeb" in Hindi heartland Kaangress dhimmi speak)

If a butcher like Akbar is praised to the skies, no doubt the "secularist" intent is that the lives of Hindu women forced to serve as "comfort girls" for Mohammedan invaders, gets emulated in the present day. These JNU & Bollywood dhimmis are collaborators in the Mohammedan demographic aggression on Hindu soil. It is no coincidence, therefore that many of these "eminent" dhimmis happen to be of "composite" parentage themselves. By the way, see how the idiot Yankee dhimmis quickly digest JNU lunatic propaganda. They're very receptive to such crap, although adamant when it comes to presenting Hindus in a fair light in their history text books; CAPEEM's struggle is a case in point.

Hindus will naturally find glorification of their Mohammedan oppressors offensive. The psecs find any resistance coming from Hindus unbearable! Here's some Bollywood dhimmi moron indulging in typical dhimmispeak and I quote:

“We have taken every precaution. A tremendous amount of research has gone into the movie,” Siddharth Roy Kapoor, executive vice president (Marketing and Distribution) of UTV Motion Pictures, told PTI.

He said “certain elements” were trying to create problems to force filmmakers to stay away from certain topics ."

Of course, you moron! These "elements" see no value in your crappy movie or it's vulgar celebration of Mohammedan genocide.
For a small glimpse of the psec poster boy's babarism, I shall quote from Sitaram Goel's book THE STORY OF ISLAMIC IMPERIALISM IN INDIA.

"Humayun had hardly any time free from troubles to devote to the service of Islam. But his son, Akbar, made quite a good start as a ghãzî. He stabbed the half-dead Himu with his sword after the Second Battle of Panipat. The ritual was then followed by many more brave warriors of Islam led by Bairam Khan who drove their swords in the dead body. In 1568 AD Akbar ordered a general massacre at Chittor after the fort had fallen. Abul Fazl records in his Akbar-Nãma as follows. There were 8,000 fighting Rajputs collected in the fortress, but there were more than 40,000 peasants who took part in watching and serving. From early dawn till midday the bodies of those ill-starred men were consumed by the majesty of the great warrior. Nearly 30,000 men were killed When Sultan Alauddin (Khalji) took the fort after six months and seven days, the peasantry were not put to death as they had not engaged in fighting. But on this occasion they had shown great zeal and activity. Their excuses after the emergence of victory were of no avail, and orders were given for a general massacre. Akbar thus improved on the record of Alauddin Khalji. Watching the war and serving the warriors were re-interpreted as acts of war! To top it all, Akbar travelled post-haste to Ajmer where he offered profuse thanks to Allah and the Prophet, and his (Akbar's) patron saint, Muinuddin Chishti, and issued a Fathnãma in which many appropriate verses of the Quran were cited in order to prove that he had followed faithfully in the footsteps of the Prophet. "