That is the topic of christist fantasy anyway. ROTFL. A few nuts like Rush Limbaugh have suggested his name as Mc Cain's running mate, ostensibly to counter Barrack Hussein Obama's attribute of Semitic "diversity"! And the TOILet paper has faithfully reproduced what nobody else would take seriously.
Senator John Mc Cain is a reasonable conservative reviled by the evangelical conquistadors due to his past criticism of christist bigotry. He would be well advised to keep his distance from rabid vampires like Bobby Jindal and Biju Mathew or else he would be contributing to the degeneration of America into a christist hellhole like El Salvador or Haiti.
4 comments:
I 100% agree with karyakarta92. jindal is an even bigger vamp. There's no zealot like a converted zealot.
Hindus are fools. Could you ever imagine a muslim giving up his religion to win governor?!?!
Would sonia maino give up her religion to "mix in" with Hindus? NO WAY. Sadly, you cannot even become PM anymore if you are a Hindu in India. We're more likely to see a Hindu PM in the UK.
This is why I have tremendous respect for Mitt Romney. Despite all of the aspersions cast on his mormon faith, he stated unequivocally that he would never change his religion and that he would gladly sacrifice his chances for the US presidency.
This is a man I can respect and admire.
NO ONE can respect someone who does not respect themselves. This is why one billion Hindus have zero respect in the world. This does not mean bullying.
The head of the anglican church in England stated that Sharia should be introduced into england! Can you imagine any englishman stating that Hindu dharma should be introduced in England? That will be a cold day in hell...
In each of our individual ways, we have to educate people how to treat Hindus.
I have seen many Hindu women who eat steaks and bacon, smoking, and start drinking hard liquor so they can "mix in" and snag white guys. Could you ever imagine a Muslim girl eating pork to mix in? Muslim women will slit their own throats before smelling a pig.
Do our Hindu fools think that they will be more acceptable if they completely transform themselves? In fact, people will have even more contempt for you and they'll exploit you.
Thank God, I have also seen many Hindus who keep their values--they refuse to violate their principles and at the same time they take the best from Western society and culture. These people command such incredible respect it's amazing.
I have seen one situation of one Indian Hindu businessman who refused to serve meat at his company banquet! Even though some people were taken aback, deep down everyone respected this man's conviction.
You don't have to make loud noises and wear your beliefs on your sleeves. Just stick to certain principles and people automatically respect you. It's incredible. Dharma is an incredibly powerful thing. You follow it, and respect follows you.
Question for Shivaji, since I presume he is Maharahtrian:
Based on what you have said above abt Hindus not giving up their values, or trying to transform themselves/blend-in,
Should North Indians give-up their 'Chaat Puja' etc. to blend in with the Maharashtrians as Mr. Raj Thackeray advocates?
Let's not go there. Raj Thackeray's position of Marathi parochialism is very disappointing.
There is no need for him to imitate the "Dravidian" neanderthals when the millions of illegal Bangladeshi Mohammedans are threatening to swamp Mumbai, over and above the 40 lakh homegrown Mohammedans. "North Indian" or "South Indian" or Gujarati "immigrants" is a non-issue. He should be going after the Bangladeshi illegals instead.
Or even kick some Kerala christist butt. Those scoundrels are everywhere, propagating the vampire cult and at the same time, selling christist snacks fried in adulterated coconut oil. If, for example, Om Prakash Chautala's goons publicly cane that bastard Valson Thampu illegally spreading christist hatred in the Delhi region in blatant violation of the law and the constitution - now, that would be a refreshing change worthy of applause. Why can't these regional leaders devote themselves to such worthwhile causes that can unite Hindus instead of making them more vulnerable to aggression by 3M adversaries?
Perhaps, this is a lamentable attempt on Raj Thackeray's part to re-invent himself as a
"secularist". The leader of one of India's allegedly "fascist" parties is compelled to practise dhimmitude and yet the Mohammedans claim that they are "oppressed" in India! Could there be a greater travesty than that?
Post a Comment