Because, Muslims, by definition are innocent under Koranic injunctions and India is a Dhimmi state bound by those injunctions.
Even The Chindu's account of the rioting failed to negate the Mohammedan pogrom this time.
http://www.hindu.com/2010/04/10/stories/2010041060680100.htm
"The accused -- Javed, Wasif and Atif -- joined a mob and were moving near Volga hotel on the Shahalibanda road on March 29. They came across a bank's van in which the victim, his colleague, a security guard and driver were travelling.
.............................
.............................
The victim was then stabbed indiscriminately. Police found that the same accused and their associates attacked a gardener, returning home on his bike, with knives. He succumbed to injuries in Osmania General Hospital later. The same gang also chased three constables of A.P.S.P., who were in plainclothes, and stabbed one of them while the other two managed to escape.
.............................
.............................
The victim, a resident of Aramghar in Rajendranagar, was going home on his bike along with his brother-in-law, Ravinder Pawar, when they came face to face with a mob.
Both fell off the two-wheeler. The mob later smashed the victim's head with boulders even before he could rise, while his relative managed to escape. The detained persons were identified as Sattar, Feroz, Mazar and Kamra."
So, per the account in The Chindu, at least 4 Hindus were brutally slaughtered by the Jihadis. I'm actually amazed that
The Chindu actually mentioned some of the Jihadi rioters by name. That is a big deal by Stalinist India's politically correct
"journalistic" standards!
Unfortunately, to be able to name the Jihadis, the Chindu might be minimizing the body count of the slaughtered Hindus by a fudge factor of 5. There were probably over 20 Hindus killed. I watched a gruesome YouTube video of a Hindu temple and it's cattle shelter burnt down by Jihadis, with several cows roasted alive in the fire.
So, what does the police do?
Bring the Mohammedan rioters
to justice, right?
Wrong!!! Samuel Reddy's legacy lives on. Therefore, the Andhra Pradesh police arrest local Hindu leaders - those offering token resistance to the Mohammedan pogrom for some imagined "right wing Hindutva conspiracy"!!
http://news.rediff.com/report/2010/apr/09/police-lift-daytime-curfew-in-parts-of-hyderabad.htm
"Meanwhile, the police have picked up Telugu Desam Party corporator and a member of Hindu Vahini Raja Singh, who was wanted in connection with the outbreak of communal violence in the Old City, sources said.
Though Singh had offered to surrender a few days ago, the police did not accept it, as it wanted to question him about the conspiracy and the people behind the riots.
The police are looking for another Bharatiya Janata Party corporator M Vaikuntam as he was also suspect in the violence."
Now, we all know how evil those
"right wing communalists" are, always active with their "conspiracies to disturb communal harmony".
I have a lingering doubt, however. If it was the Hindu "communalists" who started/incited the rioting, then they would have had the offensive advantage and the element of surprise in their attacks. Then, how does that explain the ZERO Muslim
casualties in several incidents?
How does the "Hindu aggression" explain so many Hindu casualties?
Perhaps, an inquiry commission headed by "Justice" UC (Unexplained Combustion) Banerjee will conclude that "communal" Hindus are brutally slaughtering other Hindus in order to defame the "Religion of Peace".
1 comment:
The video of the cattle shelter burned down by Muslims that Rajeev mentioned is here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_6yuzNzOyU
Post a Comment