http://www.hindu.com/2009/07/24/stories/2009072455111000.htm
Asra Ahmad Dar ---> skull crushed by his friend Imran Aslam Baba over an orkut friend!
Kupwara resident ---> happily bonking with Ashiq Hussain and likely killed by own brothers
Zahoor Ahmed Mir ---> overdosed on drugs
Shopian women ---> one likely happily bonking with someone not liked by family, likely killed by the other's husband and his family
Common thread – all alleged murder on Indian security forces
It is as I have said – never mind what the facts are, Kashmir’s India colony is to blame
7 comments:
Why is (C)Hindu suddenly getting little aggressive against Muslims?
Is it revenge for getting ditched by muslims in Waste Bengal and Kerala?
http://news.rediff.com/report/2009/jul/31/kashmir-is-a-humungous-human-tragedy.htm
Check this article about a speech by one of the members of SICKular piss brigade (Harinder Baweja along with Angana Chatterjee) on how India is responsible for the all that is happening in Kashmir
Call me a pessimist, but I am feeling that Uncle Sam had decided that India should give away kashmir, and nothing can be done to alter that.
However my worry is, will we atleast get something in return?
Here is my wishlist in the order of reducing plausibility.
1. Uniform civil code
2. Devolution of more power from center to states
3. Ram temple at ayodhya
4. at the risk of sounding preposterously optimistic - UNSC seat.
Putting aside the wishlist, do we get any relief from the parasitic Kashmiris. The kashmir valley population is less than 1crore. And just compare the amount of news coverage and international attention given to the plight of Kashmiris when we have many poorer suffering in BiMaRU + Orissa states.
I suspect even if India gives away Kashmir, some pragmatic and intelligent Kashmiri muslims may try to jump into Jammu. But they may not be secular muslims. They know that their games dont work in front of Pakistani Punjabi muslims and whereas they can always leech on Hindus. Already many such kashmiris occupied jammu lands. And they breed a lot. Do we still have Abdullas and Ghulam Nabi Azad managing our national affairs? My blood boils whenever Ghulam Nabi Azad comes to southern states to manage national and state affairs of congress. It is truly kafkaesque that we can’t even travel to kashmir safely but kashmiris can migrate and prosper anywhere in India and even become national cabinet ministers etc still we remain the bad guys.
MMS and his sonia-worshipping crew of hindu bashers would readily do the same. They blamed Samjhauta blasts on "Hindu terrorists", Godhra train burning as the work of kitchen fire or hindus burning themselves. "Hindu terror" is a phantasm of all sections of the 4M.
Ashok Kumar that list shows how most Hindus are clueless on the important things.
UCC is not that important from a Hindu viewpoint, the current laws allow polygyny among Muslims without it being criminal. In practical terms this has no effect on Muslim tfr which is higher for other reasons. In any case Muslims also practice female feoticide along with Hindus but less so, that means most Muslim men cannot have more than one wife even if they wanted to. The only bad effect is some Hindu men who convert to marry more than one women. In any case imposition of monogamy by the state is nothing but tyranny by the liberal class, you will never hear the feminists & liberals crying about polyandry which is prevalent among certain Hindu tribes in HP due to economic reasons.
I agree that states should have more power.
Ram mandir, again this should come way down the priority list.
The most important issue is illegal infiltration from Bangladesh & the much higher tfr among Muslims. In one more generation Hindus will be a minority in Kerala thanks to the differences in tfr. It is useless to talk about ram mandir or any mandir if you do not have any strategy for the ever growing Muslim population, if they become a substantial % of India again they will demand a second partition with Assam, WB, Kerala & parts of UP & Bihar becoming Mughalistan (already demanded by Samar Abbas). Then they will destroy the ram mandir you rebuilt if they have strength in numbers around the Ayodhya area.
Hindus are a rapidly declining community in India whereas Muslims & Xtians are growing, if you cannot tackle this problem then all else is a waste of time. In a democracy those with the numbers have the most clout.
Look up Lebanon & what happened to the Maronite Xtians there as the country slowly became Muslim majority.
In 1881 all of Bengal was barely Muslim majority, in other words just a few decades prior to that Hindus were still the majority among bongs but tfr difference changed all that & come partition time the overall Muslim majority excuse was used to demand all of Bengal for Muslims, when that was not possible EB was lopped off for them.
Why do you think certain areas became Pakistan whereas others like TN & AP didn't, was it because of Muslim generosity, no it was because these provinces did not have a Muslim majority or even substantial Muslim minorities. Muslims know that & are bent on changing the demography to their advantage, the rest will follow naturally after this is accomplished.
If India cannot stop the decline in Hindu population (in % terms not absolute numbers) then it is doomed to civil war & a second partition.
Harish,
I know the importance of demography. In fact almost the entire non-muslim world including Russia (chechenya) and recently China (Xinjiang) is worried about increasing muslim demographic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America_Alone
It is a great book by Mark Steyn, who describes how entire europe may become muslim majority (eurabia) by 2050 and then America is alone in the world standing up for individual liberty and democratic ideals.
I sometimes wonder whether Congress, Communists and the other armies of pseudo-secularism are raising a Frankestein monster by overdoing their hindu bashing and appeasement of islam in their pursuit of short term political power, the monster which will destroy its own creator later on. If I were a rational purely power obsessed congressman/communist, I would be afraid of the future of the party/ideology due to increasing muslim demographic. Communists already saw this bitter reality in Waste Bengal and Kerala. Thats why Communist mouthpiece Hindu was recently publishing good number of articles critical of radical islam.
So it is in Congress' own interest to keep the hardcore muslim demographic down to retain its power over docile hindus. What if Sonia Gandhi (I doubt she is that smart) and her trusted loyalists are incapable of comprehending it? Thats a scary thought. Let's hope she did not give the strategic planning task to any crypto-islamists in Congress.
Anyway the wishlist I mentioned are the most probable things Congress can do to avoid Hindu backlash after giving away kashmir.
The common commie cadre has no clue of all this but the ones at the top know this very well but see the destruction of Hindus as a way to a proletariat revolution, its just that Muslims are smarter than them & consider commies to be useful idiots (eg: look what happened to commies in Iran after the revolution or in Pakistan after partition).
Feminism is part of the same camp, constant demonization of Hindu males & Hindu culture but grovelling before the Muslims.
I do think the top brass in Congress knows about the dangers of Muslim demography, they just don't care as long as they can continue looting the public through taxes.
The world is sleepwalking into disaster & they will have a rude awakening when the costs of Muslim demography hit them just like it hit the whites & Hindus in Bradford.
Post a Comment