Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Teesta Setalvad's perjury -- repeat post

No other newspaper outside the Indian Express has even reported this matter.
Though this topic has been covered at an older post, it merits re-emphasis.
Teesta and co essentially asked the poor victims to sign-up on fabricated stories!
This is not just truth by repeated assertion, but truth by direct subversion of Insititutions and the law.
The woman should be strung up next to the parliament bomber.

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/sc-affidavit-wrong-didnt-know-what-we-signed-riot-victim/399007/

Malek said the affidavit was “fabricated” and had “incorrect” information. He alleged it was drafted in English without his knowledge by Rais Khan, coordinator of the Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP), who made him sign on the affidavit. “I had mentioned this in my statement to the SIT too,” he said.

But Rais Khan claims it was CJP secretary Teesta Setalvad who sent him affidavits for signatures. “Teesta Setalvad used to send me these affidavits through e-mail. I used to take printouts and get them signed after calling the persons concerned to Shahpur. All these affidavits were drafted by Setalvad along with some legal experts,” Khan said. When contacted, Setalvad declined comment.

6 comments:

karyakarta92 said...

Right, these poor blue collar Muslims are victims of Teesta Setalvad's perverted "SECULAR" fanaticism. They were never really "victimised" by Hindus, themselves at the receiving end of a "SECULAR" pogrom for over 6 decades.

blogger said...

Thanks for sharing, this B!7(h is exposed.

witan said...

To: karyakarta92

It does not appear to be "fanaticism". More like venality, defined as
"prostitution of talents or offices or services for reward"
(etymology: originally in the sense 'available for purchase': from Latin venalis, from venum 'thing for sale').
"Fanaticism" implies that the miscreant believes what he or she is doing is right; "venality" is committed purely for "reward".

witan said...

Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus
With due respect, I feel it is necessary for the Supreme Court to review their decisions in all cases related to Godhra, especially "Best Bakery".

Anonymous said...

Thanks for the post. I had missed the previous post, one likes to avoid worms like teesta , but it is good know what they are up to.

R.Sajan said...

Mercenary intellectuals and activists are not new in this country.

I feel that it is good. If you pay more, you can always count on them to cross floors and act for you.

It is known that external agencies have many of our pillars of principle on their pay-roll.