Just a few days ago, I read something about why Aurangzeb got the Kashi temple demolished. Some sundry queen of a vassal kingdom was harassed there or something.
I wonder if the dhimmi so-called intellectuals really accept this as even 1% reason to demolish a temple (maybe they do) !! Or is this a feeble attempt to show the fundamentalist Islamic terrorist called Aurangzeb in a good light? Sadly, it falls flat on its face.
Demolishing a temple because some woman was teased there... Rather than showing Aurangzeb in some good light (like the pseudo-secular dhimmis were hoping), it just reinforces the truth that he was a typical Islamic tyrant.
This incident of some queen being harassed there is most probably a fabrication, another hoax created by the "eminent historians" - http://satyameva-jayate.org/2008/04/05/lies-and-half-truths-part-2/.
The most pertinent question regarding all this still remains - Have there never been any incidents of women being molested in mosques? Why dont we destroy them all, in the true tradition of secular India? The probabilities of molestation and rape (and also goat slaughter) are infact much higher in mosques, going by statistical trends, arent they?
5 comments:
Women are not allowed in mosques (or have separate prayer halls out of sight of the men). The reason for this is central to Islamic way of life for women; dont let your presence distract the men.
An Australian imam recently justified sexual assault on women "If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the backyard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it ... whose fault is it, the cats or the uncovered meat?
It seems that the prophet knew his folks too well and robbed us of many potential rape-in-the-mosque stories. Prophet he is, existence be upon him
It is natural to criticize Aurangzeb, to keep that spirit because victory of this killer means victory of terrorism .
----
BTW It is nice to find you again ..DarkStorm. Hope you are doing well.
On a different issue:
If you remember there was mention in this blog on the skull measurement...and your question was not answered. So while writing the following posts, I was thinking about you.... I think my post debugs the original trap of sickularist, why good people became sickularist.
Writen badly...but this write up explains some experiences of reading skull measurement and it has a refutation of the same:
http://smokeyright.wordpress.com/2008/04/21/a-cultural-superstructure/
It is important to refute it, because this thing is sticky. Atleast for 2 days I believed in skull measurement...deeply uncomfortable at future of such a person, but I had no arguments against skull measurements ( the conclusion was less important) whose effect was so dramatic on me ....Skull measurement has been that it has been part of standard sociology books...and it makes one brain dead.
This article has couple of links on the extremes to which it was taken in Germany.
http://smokeyright.wordpress.com/2008/03/17/on-race-and-the-national-socialists/
For anybody cares..Following link records Americans refusing to be described by sociology...
http://smokeyright.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/sociology-lessons/
DarkStorm>>> … this incident of some queen being harassed there is most probably a fabrication…
It is not probably a fabrication IT IS A fabrication, why? Because Somnath was not destroyed once but several times and it was not the only temple that was destroyed by barbaric mussalmans.
It's a fabrication that has been dealt with a long time ago, here is the link for anyone interested:
http://koenraadelst.bharatvani.org/articles/ayodhya/kashivishvanath.html
Have a look at Aurangzeb, as he was according to Mughal Records...
http://according-to-mughal-records.blogspot.com/
Best
Aslam
Post a Comment