christism and mohammedanism are identical imperialist ideologies, just like marxism. they are not religions. so the godman criticizing mohammedans is pretty much the pot calling the kettle black.
but the interesting thing is the power of those supporting the mohammedans. they have forced the godman to eat his words. this is worth noting. christism's leading godman floated a trial balloon, but had to retreat headlong and make a quasi-apology.
this is further evidence that christism is dying. it started dying when the so-called 'enlightenment' in europe caused ordinary whites to stand up and tell the godmen that the ideology they were pushing was nonsense. it has not stopped declining. it's only in third world countries that christist money from white people is propping up this wretched dogma.
the question is, will euro-america decline fast enough that christists won't have enough money to destroy other cultures such as hinduism?
the answer is in the affirmative for mohammedanism because it wont be long before oil becomes worthless again and the arabs can go back to their camels and eating sand. and the yanks will seize and nationalize all their overseas assets.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Yash
| Two sides of the same coin 9/16/2006, Shachi Rairikar |
5 comments:
Actually Rajeev, the last word - as ever so often belongs to Sandhya Jain.
Yet another acute analysis . You will love her description of how the 'secularist' Europe, with all it's pretentions - moralises other religions by creating a political space for their 'creed'. In the cow-belt north they would say Pope ke kandhey par bandook rakh kar, doosrey par goli chalaatey hain.
When even the kings of Secularism and 'Autonomy for Kashmir' admit that Musharraf is sponsoring terrorism in India - what can explain Manmoron Singh creating a joint anti-terror outfilt with Pakistan?
I have to disagree with B Raman - it is not the Stockholm Syndrome - is the Dhimmi Syndrome
We will accept twenty (or whatever the latest count is) humiliating conditions for our existence - please just don't call us anti-Muslim. Please - we beg of you - we are good Dhimmis!
Cacoethes
This report is not worth the paper it is written on. Who gives a rats ass what the Jesus freaks thinks. And when was the last time these 3rd century idiots appreciated other religions anyway. So don’t bother to read it and toss it in the garbage because that is where it belongs.
And FYI about how all these “human rights” laws were enacted and how discriminatory it is towards Hinduism I suggest you this article - The Ethics of Prostelysing by Rajiv Malhotra
http://conversionagenda.blogspot.com/2000/11/ethics-of-proselytizing.html
@ Shahryar - good and noble pointer on the Kashmiri Pandit angle. I guess it's too much to ask for Guptaji to even bring up the issue!
Siva - you are bang on target calling them the Jesus Freaks.
The office within Foggy Bottom that is responsible for releasing this report is headed by John Hanford - whose notable qualification for this post is a - wait for it- Masters of Divinity (yes - there is such a thing!) from the Gordon-Cornwell Theological Seminary , which is an "Interdenominational Evagelical Seminary"
Since the Evangelicals across "denominations" are agreed on one thing i.e. soul-harvesting - therefore the only measure of religious freedom for them will be the fact that there should be no law that restricts conversions aka soul-harvesting.
However, if people are interested we could start a forum to refute specific points in the report.
Post a Comment