mar 15th, 2009
the 'national shame' is the kkkangress itself. after 60 years of their rule, it is distressig -- but not surprising -- that this is the case. the kkkangrass (and the communists) *need* the persistence of poverty. anybody who gets to be a little affluent will see through their bullshit.
and this sepoy from the nytimes is saying this? why, the atlanticists are coming to their senses that the kkkangress is bad news for them? or is that they softening them up for their 'land for piss' scheme, whereby india gives up land to be mohammedans in return for them not pissing on the yanks?
3 comments:
Rajeev,
Yet the same "poor people" continue to vote for the KKKangress. Even though KKKangress has done JackSh*t for these "poor people" for 50 years, yet KKKangress keeps getting elected and someone like Modi keeps getting pilloried. Maybe these "poor people" deserve their state.
more reason to invest heavily and better agriculture - it is the key to indian prosperity
rajeev, this article is a collective shame. Blaming it on Congress is unfair. e.g. the article mentions MP as the worst state in child hunger. Who is ruling MP?
Post a Comment