the pseudo-secular insist on "proof" when it comes to the rama sethu. but they happily support christist mythology. there is no "proof" that this thomas blighter ever arrived in india, or that he established churches, or that he converted nambudiris.
the simple matter is that
a) there were no nambudiris in kerala in 52 ce, as the place was buddhist/jain then
b) thomas died in ortona, italy, as certified by the vatican itself
c) ratzy himself said thomas's arrival in south india was a myth
d) even if thomas had arrived in kerala, and there were nambudiris there, they would have been completely insane to listen to the rantings of a barbarian shouting insanities ("ye children of serpents" etc.). let us remember than in 52 ce, paul had barely managed to make up the jesus hoax, and the christists had no money. so a guy waving "mutilated-corpse-of-dead-arab-stuck-on-a-stick" was not even possible then, and if he were, he would have been laughed at
e) the portuguese were the ones who conveniently conflated the story of thomas of cana, a refugee fleeing i think chrisitist bigots around 345 ce after the council of nicae and was given refuge in india (that was pretty dumb in hindsight) and the fictitious 'saint' thomas
f) the 'saint' thomas is truly miraculous: he has left 2 skeletons, one as a young man in chennai, and one as an old man in ortona, italy
lies, lies and more lies.
From: Swami
From: HARAN BR <
Respected Elders!
Namaskarams. Please find below a 'news item', which is self explanatory.
I am deeply concerned about this. As we are all aware, Hisotorian Veda Prakash, in the late eighties, has researched and published a small Tamil book on the bluff of St.Thomas and the present Santhome Church, which was the original Kapaleeshwarar Temple of Mylapore. The same has been established by Swami Devanantha Saraswathi (pen name: Ishwar Saran - visit www.hamsa.org). His interview has also been published in 'Expressions of Christianity' brought out by Vivekananda Kendra.
I strongly feel that if this movie is allowed to be completed and exhibited as per their plans, it would do immense damage to Hindus and Sanatana Dharma.
As we are aware, recently, Pope Bennedict himself has categorically stated that St.Thomas has never landed at Indian coast.
Hence, this project should not be allowed to take off at any cost. We must nip it in the bud.
I request you all, to kindly look into the matter and do the needful at the earliest.
Thanking You All,
With Warm Regards,
B.R.Haran.
NEWS ITEM:-
http://www.theindiancatholic.com/report.asp?nid=10457
June 12, 2008
Church plans mega-budget movie on St. Thomas
KOCHI: The Archdiocese of Madras-Mylapore is planning to produce a 300 million rupee movie on St. Thomas, one of the 12 Apostles of Jesus Christ, revered as the apostle of India.
Archbishop A. M. Chinnappa, who heads the archdiocese, presented 30 crore project before a meeting of Kerala Catholic Bishops' Council seeking their support this week.
The project, scheduled to be inaugurated by Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi is expected match Hollywood big-budget movies such as Ben-Hur and the Ten Commandments in budget and in quality.
Church officials plan to launch the project on July 3, the feast day of St. Thomas, in the San Thome Basilica campus in Chennai. The 70-MM, two-and-half-hour feature film would have the bigwigs of Indian film industry on the credit line.
Indian Cardinal Ivan Dias, Prefect of the Sacred Congregation of the Propagation of Faith, supports the project along with the bishops in Tamil Nadu, media said quoting Archbishop Chinnappa.
St. Thomas is believed to have arrived in Kerala in 52 AD and established seven churches on the western coast. Tradition also holds that he was martyred in 72 AD in Mylapore. Hence the Churches in Kerala and Tamilnadu have special importance for the movie, said the archbishop.
The Archbishop also hoped that a film on the life of St. Thomas would have spiritual consolation for people of all walks of life as it evolved around the theme of human equality and dignity for all.
The film will be made in Tamil first, then in Malayalam and Hindi and later dubbed into various other languages, including English and French, according to church officials
1 comment:
"Ceasar's Messiah: The Roman Conspiracy to invent Jesus" by Joseph Atwill is a well researched and reviewed book which offers not only an explanation for the motive behind the creation of christianism, but also the reasons for the way christians have behaved over the centuries. Though hardly any present-day christian knows it, they are all inadvertent worshippers of the Roman Caesar Titus, cast in disguise as the Messiah Jesus. This book puts to rest the contradictions in the Jesus' "life" and "ministry" by showing that Jesus was just a story (built up with the help of Roman court historians) that served a purpose: to keep the messianic Jews from rebelling against the Romans.
All the miracles done by Jesus are a pale embellishments of very real and militaristic events in the life of Titus. "Evangelion: and "Gospel" mean "good news of a military victory", not just "good news", like missionaries tell you. The "eucharist" is based on Mary of the House of Hyssop eating her own baby after roasting it (this was common practice during seiges, the besieged people used to resort to cannibalism). This story has been put into the Jesus Story by the Romans to keep making fun of the people they wanted to put down (the messianic jews), and make sure they will eat something and call it "the body of jesus" and think they are doing something spiritual; when actually it is part of the series of jokes the Romans play through their invention of Jesus.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCNJf83bqjs
Post a Comment