except in the ROP. Violence against women for defying patriarchal authority does occur even among "secularist" Hindus, notably the "Dravidians", "Samajwadis" etc, but they are relatively infrequent and pale in comparison to the sheer brutality so characteristic of the Arabian desert.
Such cruelty to one's own offspring for the crime of a romantic liaison with a
despicable infidel male. THE BOOK enjoins upon its adherents to act thus. Therefore, Indian dhimmocracy grants total freedom to perpetrate such barbarism. This is the toothless, impotent Indian secularism that the loony bin "progressives" are so committed to preserving. These are the incidents that pseudo-liberals of Amnesty International, Council for Religious Freedom etc should mention when they beat up India for human rights violations etc. It is Hindu and women's human rights being violated flagrantly by Mohammedans and Christists.
And the Mohammedans are well acquainted with the impotence of the dhimmi Indian judiciary - Note the defense attorney's open justification of the gruesome "honour killing" as an example to other Mohammedan women!
Mumbai, July 12, 2008
"In a case that can only be described as brutal, a sessions court on Friday convicted a couple of killing their teenaged daughter and sentenced them to life imprisonment. The court held Mohammed Munna Khan and Gulnaz Khan guilty of killing Mehnaz Khan and cutting her body into 11 pieces to destroy the evidence. The body parts, stashed in two sacks, were found near the J.J. flyover on July2, 2006.
...................
A minor daughter of the couple who participated in the crime is being tried separately by a juvenile court.
...................
The motive behind the murder: Mehanaz had married a Hindu boy despite opposition from her family and moved in with him in Panvel. On July 1, Munna, Gulnaz and three others had gone to Panvel to bring her back, saying a proper marriage ceremony would be conducted. She agreed to come home. But when she got there, Mehanaz strangled her with a towel while Gulnaz held her legs and her minor sister clamped her mouth shut. A PTI report quoted investigating officer Hinduram Patil as saying: “Khan peeled off the skin from her face and cut her nose so no one could identify the body if recovered.”
Defence lawyer Wahab Khan. said the case wasn’t rarest of rare as cause of death was strangulation and the body was cut only with intention to destroy evidence. He also argued that the Khans had “committed murder only to set an example for their other daughters, so they didn’t follow in their sister’s footsteps”. "
1 comment:
-- argued that the Khans had “committed murder only to set an example for their other daughters, so they didn’t follow in their sister’s footsteps” --
He should be lauded in the annals of legal argumentation for stating the painfully obvious. This is the first time I have seen "committed murder" followed by "only to".
Post a Comment