The article in Frontline pertains to caste tensions in Tamil Nadu purely between "Dravidians" and "Dalits". Yet, phrases such as "Caste Hindus" and "Caste Hindus unleash reign of terror" are used with liberty to demonise the poor oppressed Tamil Hindus who are hardly in a position to persecute anybody.
Recently, a Hindu exhibition on Aurangzeb's tyranny as recorded by Mughal chroniclers was vandalised and shut down by the Dravidian police under the specious excuse of an alleged threat of "communal discord". Where were the Chindu and Frontline pseudo-liberals hiding when the "universal" right to free speech was denied selectively to the Hindus of Tamil Nadu? Hundreds of BJP and Hindu Munnani offices were targeted by "Dravidian" goons in a synchronised terror attack a few months back. These are the same individuals persecuting "Dalits" in the latest instance. "The Hindu" and "Frontline" indulge in nomenclature terrorism by labeling them "Caste Hindus" in one context and "DMK workers" in another.
4 comments:
yes, kk, it is pure hypocrisy and lies. the DMK are crypto-christists, and have nothing to do with hindus. and the DMK are the ones oppressing the harijans.
"social justice" in "dravidian" terminology == "opportunity for middle-caste rascals like t r baalu, ev ramaswamy naicker, m karunanidhi, et al, to loot the public treasury while doing nothing for the really poor low-castes who are still murdering baby girls by the thousands and are refused admission to these middle-caste-run establishments unless they become christists."
The name 'Chindu' sounds too soft for that rabid 'secular' newspaper. Maybe we should call it 'The Anti-Hindu' instead? Maybe someone can suggest a better term?
I strongly condemn Mr.nizhal yoddha for stating periyar as 'rascal'. periyar always fought for the self-respect of lower class,the working class. he wanted to make them realize that they are not slaves but free humans. this class struggle did exists in all countries including developed European countries that is why communism came to existence. in india the lower class were dalits 'dravidians' and upper class were aryans 'bhramans'and vaishnavas etc,. it was Hinduism that induced caste system in dravidian culture for their advantage in the name of god via ramayanam and mahabharatam. hence he started to question the hindu culture ,rituals and ultimately the very existence of ram, krishna and other so called hindu gods. Periyar fought for human rigts that was denied by hindus to dalits like entry inside temple etc,.but this didn't exist in Christianity hence he suggested them to join Christianity because it was hard for the people to accept the non existence of god. since Hinduism is the root for all this inequality they wanted to destroy hinduism.
absolute stuff and nonsense, dmk bozo! naicker was a first-class ruffian and a fraud, who was purchased by the christists.
christists egalitarian? they are the ones who INVENTED racism, apartheid and slavery! christism is the most oppressive religion in the world (with only mohammedanism and communism coming close). it has killed 100 million people!
you are clearly a brainwashed dmk crypto-christist. i don't even know why i am responding to you.
Post a Comment