why is it no surprise at all that this blighter studied at christist medical college, vellore, and that they are agitating on his behalf?
the christist church is hand in glove with the communists. see the trouble in orissa recently.
similarly the ISI is also hand in glove with the communists, who of course get the majority of their funds and media support from han chinese and their flunkeys like n ram.
once again, all the semitic death cults are of one mind when it comes to the Final Solution for indics: extinction.
now that AIDS is in the picture, can sandeep pandey of ASHA be far behind?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Vinay
AID or "Association for India's Destruction" has again started to campaign in favor of the arrested naxalite Binayak Sen ( Just look at his picture in the following link)
http://naxalwatch.blogspot.com/2007/05/naxal-supporter-binayak-sen-arrester.html
--------------------------------------------------------
AID is holding "candle light vigils" in various Chapters in USA on May 13/14 and is soliciting support from various groups who fall for their misleading words
Watch out , for Indian Naxal movement is BANNED in the US . Association with AID may land your group in trouble
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
7 comments:
I do not know Dr Binayak Sen. Never met hi, and I don't think I will ever have any cause or occasion to meet him.
It is true that there are Christians defending him. An ex-professor of his from his alma mater wrote a strong piece in Tehelka, about what he knew of him.
It is true that Christian missions and missionaries do not have India's good at heart, or we would not have had the Nagalanad problem. And of course, trouble elsewhere too.
However, Hindu Indians must take a good look at themsleves. There IS social injustice on the basis of caste and class. I am born in a high caste Hindu family which was not badly off, but had I been born in a poor 'low caste' family, I would have become either a Commie or Christian, would have been on the run or dead.
With the administration and media in collaboration, it is easily possible to condemn anyone as a terrorist sympathiser. Accusations can be easily planted, even evidences are planted and we all know this happens even in the US. Dr Binayak Sen gave up the chance to be another successful money making medic, his career has been brilliant and he had every chance to do so. Many a sensitive mind is attracted by Communism as an ideology, especially when they are affronted by atrocities and oppression. Not surprisingly, SC / ST Hindus choose to convert as they feel they can get a better deal in life. And I have personally known a few cases where their lot HAS IMPROVED, perhaps after a generation or two. I can definitely say that those families would not achieved their current status without the education that conversion made available. The education brought opportunities within their grasp which they did justice to, with merit.
But the opportunity came their way because of their parents had converted. As 'lower caste' Hindus, they would not have reached anywhere near their present status. What are Hindus really doing to keep themselves together as a cohesive mass that would benefit Hindus and India?
It is convenient to call Dr Sen a commie / christist / terrorist sympathiser and condemn him. But please do bear in mind that he was in a position to be a part of the system and benefit from it. So, without prejudice, please think twice.
Anand
1) As per your logic then, Osama Bin Laden deserves sympathy for the billionaire chose to not go by the system and chose to live in caves and "fight" for the "human rights" of the Afghanis. Of course all the videos could very well be engineered by US , you see
2) Your statement that "If I were poor and low caste I would have become commie or christian" simply shows you are not aware of ground realities. That statement is an insult to the millions of Harijan Hindus, Adivasi Hindus who continue to serve the Hindu Cause
3) One can always quote personal example. A couple of generations back, my own family could have been very well classified as a "poor backward caste" . Remaining Hindus have not at all come in the way of my family's progress. And yes, I do know many many more such people throughout India, and in the US
4) And finally, why is it that in certain cases the argument is "Let the law take its course" nd in certain "the courts and government must be fabricating evidence" ?
"been born in a poor 'low caste' family, I would have become either a Commie or Christian, would have been on the run or dead."
BS, most of the top commies are upper caste and Bengali, look up the media commies, i see very few low castes. WB CM Bhattacharya,Angana Chatterjee, Naxal Ram (tambram), see a pattern there.
"I would have become either a Commie or Christian, would have been on the run or dead."
Since when did u become the self appointed spokesman of "low" castes?
The only thing I hate more than caste superiority bs is "upper" castes like u who think u can speak for us, as if we r some dumb sheep in need of our "savior" anand.
I have plenty of friends who are what u wud call "low" caste, Kolis to be specific, they are classified as OBC, and everyone of them is a proud HINDU not a commie or a xtian, they are in ur parlance referred to as Hindu "extremists".
So I would advice u to f**k off and stop acting as our spokesman and mind ur own f**ing business, capeesh?
drisya, i must agree with your forceful views. it is an insult to millions of 'low-caste' hindus that anand suggests they should become commie or christist, although i am sure anand did not mean it as an insult.
there is an interesting dynamic at work here. a lot of lower-caste people -- i speak specifically of ezhavas in kerala -- who were attracted to communism have now reverted to hinduism, or at least their children have, becoming very religious. this is because they realized that semitic death cults are fundamentally nihilistic and useless. a fictional example of this is that masterpiece by o v vijayan, "generations", where chamiarappan becomes theodore and then realizes that christism is useless, so he just keeps the name, but leaves christism as well.
there are two fundamental fallacies at play here; and these are interesting and important enough that i will write a post on them: the other side of caste.
the fallacies are a) a high-caste belief that hinduism somehow belongs to them (no, it doesn't; it belongs to all hindus and it was entrusted to the high-castes for safe-keeping, which they didn't do a great job of) b) a version of liberal guilt that makes brahmins apologize for lots of things they didn't (and don't) actually do -- the oppression of the lowest castes is typically done by the castes just above them. do stop apologizing, brahmins -- you actually a lot to be proud of, because you have kept the religion alive in the face of determined semitic attacks.
actually, you guys will wish you hadn't gotten me started on caste, because i am constantly threatening to write a book on it (it is such an interesting concept, and i maintain that caste is a good thing), and i might start by inflicting my views on you guys :-)
anand, ur a traitor bastard. because of morons like you, hindus r in the gutter. im low caste, i dont need ne brom bastard like u speaking for me.
if nething, its high upper caste bastards that r doing all the mischief, u bastards will pay the price for being commie collaborators.
especially u BONGOLI roshgolloh eating mofos. im coming for you. you best be scared when you hear the sound of a chainsaw approaching proximity.
"Adivasi Hindus who continue to serve the Hindu Cause"
drisyadrisya not to nitpick but this is a misleading term introduced by xtian missionaries to create new divisions, Adivasi literally means first inhabitants or Aboriginal and is nonsensical when used for the tribals in Bharat. Many tribal groups (example in the North East) are late entrants into Bharat compared to the "mainstream aryan" Hindus, how do they then become "aboriginal"?
This term was never used until xtians coined it in the colonial era and there is NO evidence to say that tribals are the earliest inhabitants different from other Hindus, infact new tribes have been forming through all these years, example during Muslim invasions many Rajputs escaped into the forests to escape the atrocities of the followers of religion of peace, in time because of the isolation they became a new tribe or caste themselves with remnants of their earlier Rajput practices of course, if you want to explore this topic, please refer to "Growth of Scheduled Tribes and Castes in Medieval India" by KS Lal, and "Indigenous Indians: Agastya to Ambedkar" by Koenraad Elst.
The correct term is either Vanavasi, Girijan, Vanavasi was the term always used.
However, Hindu Indians must take a good look at themsleves. There IS social injustice on the basis of caste and class. I am born in a high caste Hindu family which was not badly off, but had I been born in a poor 'low caste' family, I would have become either a Commie or Christian, would have been on the run or dead.
Many Hindu Indians are taking a breathtaking view of themselves into the vastness before going to work.
They see unlike the JNU historians who see the dirty relations of Advasis Vs bastards(The aryans are not supposed to be pure/white in India), the power and economy disguised as religion etc etc.
That fact is that Anand, you have been converted, at least to a commie without your knowledge.
Think of the possibility that you could have been raised in a corrupted environment among sycophants, who looked upto the high pedestral of JNU morons and dirty politicians as Mahatmas?
Post a Comment