doing what mohammedans always do: ummah uber alles.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: K
From: K
| http://www.faithfreedom.org/wordpress/?p=9930 "She does not seem to have done this either for money or love," the sources said. As it was revealed later, Gupta had converted to Islam six years ago and as the result switched her allegiance to the enemy of her own country. *************************************************************************************************************** Minor detail the secularists don't want us to know - so she is 'Madhuri' as per our chattering airheads, and not, say, 'Maimuna?' Maimuna would be especially appropriate, because that's Arabic for 'trustworthy'... |
3 comments:
HT did carry a small piece on this woman's conversion (online). But it has been totally glossed over by the media, as usual -- the focus being on her imaginary or real grouses against her superiors.
The whole business of "secularism" is BECAUSE all those at the higher levels were not Hindus--beginning with "accidental Hindu" Nehru, Muslim convert Indira, Christian convert Rajiv, Christian wife Antonia "Sonia" Maino and Christian progeny.
Whether it is Malik Kafur or Teesta Setalvad or Madhuri Gupta, Islam makes them into unbelievable fanatics.Wonder which Islamic gene our other secularists (all the "eminent historians", Angana Chatterjee, Vijay Prashad, Siddharth Varadarajan, Praveen Swamy etc etc) have imbibed?
Most of these eminent personalities come in contact with similarly polished high class Muslims who show no aggressively fanatic traits. Of course, the norm in civil society is to not to attack privacy and religious beliefs are part of this. If you keep your faith to yourself and do not tell me that your faith is superior to every other - which includes mine - I am obligated to respect you likewise. If you violate this and denigrate my faith, I am at liberty to strike back.
This creates an unnecessary ugliness and vitiates otherwise healthy relationships. So the eminent people are mostly secular because they are uncomfortable discussing religion. They are also mostly ignorant even about their own religion and know nothing at all about others.
At our workplace, there is one Muslim character who does not pass up an opportunity to boast about Islam. He does not attack other religions, he only talks about the pluses of Islam as he sees them. Since he does not attack the minuses of other religions, he is not willing to discuss Islam objectively and says so openly saying he will not tolerate a discussion if disparaging statements are made about Islam (tauheen to nahin sunoonga). Gives a clue, isn't it?
Post a Comment