yeah, right, californian expert says this, after examining a xerox copy!
http://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/NorthAmerica/Narendra-Modi-letters-genuine-says-US-forensic-expert/Article1-1099921.aspx
i have no doubt that the letter is genuine, because there are enough jaichands. but to claim some batty yank woman who looked at a xerox copy is able to authenticate it is pretty much bullshit. this is the level of 'proof' that the FOIL buffoons (which is the same as CAG) and the islamists need.http://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/NorthAmerica/Narendra-Modi-letters-genuine-says-US-forensic-expert/Article1-1099921.aspx
--
sent from samsung galaxy note, so please excuse brevity
1 comment:
The "FOIL (aka CAG)" guys certainly could not have seen the original of the letter sent to Obama and received by him. But even otherwise, FOIL (aka CAG) said only that it is not a cut-and-paste (or copy-and-paste) job. What is the guarantee that the signatures were FORGED in the original letters delivered to Obama in November and December last year? That will be clear only if signatures on the "letter" are checked against authenticated signatures of the purported signatories. Further, re-sending the "letter" by fax after eight months without the consent of the purported signatories is by itself a criminal act.
Post a Comment