sequence of events: 1. researchers demonstrate proof of concept on an EVM from elsewhere. CEC reacts: ah, but that's not on the indian EVM, which is super-duper wonderful and safe
2. researchers say, okay, give us an indian EVM. CEC reacts: oh, no, can't do that, it's confidential. but trust me, indian EVMs are impregnable. and since you have not demonstrated any fraud on indian EVMs, whatever you say is wrong
3. researchers get an EVM from an anonymous source. CEC reacts: arrest researcher, try to find out who the source was so they can be persecuted
why is a witchhunt the focus of the election commission, and not trying to improve the security of the elections?
and you were saying the CEC has nothing to hide? if so, why is the CEC so reluctant to let someone demonstrate the possibility that indian EVMs can be defeated, and remove those problems?
conclusion, by occam's razor: CEC has everything to hide.
therefore it is likely that certain elections were stolen. left to the imagination of the reader which those might be.
hint: one-man, one-vote, one-time.
No comments:
Post a Comment