Wednesday, February 03, 2010

virile pathans and their 'kuttans': sexual identify confusion

feb 3rd, 2010

say it isn't so! all those virile pathans/khans in bollywood are closet 'confused-sexuality types'? jeez, you yanks shouldn't prick (no pun intended) these illusions :-)

wendy doniger will have a field day with um... field research. as it is evident some other yank women (hint initials r r) may have. we should send martha nussbaum as well so they can all learn (about) the subtle pleasures of entry from the rear.

must be disinformation by fox. surely virile pathans not 'confused about sexuality!' ROTFL 
 must send doniger to study

4 comments:

Sujeev said...

Whatever the proclivities of Afghan Pasthun men, there doesn't seem to be a negative effect on the fertility of Afghan women, which is atleast several points higher than today's (educated) Hindu women. We can laugh at such articles, but ultimately a way has to be found to reduce the fertility of Afghan, and other muslim women, to below replacement levels if ever the Islamic juggernaut is to be turned back! Otherwise we will just be laughing ourselves into oblivion.......

Anonymous said...

The article is yet another western tactic to paint afghanis as primitives in contrast to the do-gooding westerners there, based on selected instances.

Repetition of the same tactic that painted native americans as given to human sacrifice, african tribes as cannibalistic, indians as superstitious idolators and so on in every part of the world.

westerners are past masters at this game which is then used to justify their civilizing mission, which actually means killing off the natives and appropriating their land and wealth.

Anonymous said...

i wont be too worried about muslims taking over the whole world. if islam does not achieve its goal of turning the whole world into islam, it only means that a day is going to come when there is no islam in this world and nobody will call him/her as a muslim. i am waiting for this day and hope it comes soon.

witan said...

I don't think it is a matter of "confused sexuality". It could be more like "if it moves, ♂ it".