nov 9th, 2009

there is no question that they cannot be trusted if they have to fight against other mohammedans. they won't. 

remember vijayanagar. the 'secular' king had two generals who were mohammedans. when the mohdan bahmini sultans were fighting vijayanagar at the battle of talikota, the mohdan generals turned coat, killed the 90-year king atop his elephant, beheaded him and impaled his head on a spear. seeing this, the vijayanagar army panicked and was routed.

the same can be said of barack *hussain* obama as well. anybody remember how he genuflected to the saudi king a few months back? 

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
Date: Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 5:21 AM
Subject: Bloody events will reinforce suspicion that Muslims cannot be trusted.......and Indian Secular SOB's want to bring Muslims into the Indian Armed Forces
To:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/ben_macintyre/article6907085.ece

 

Bloody events will reinforce suspicion that Muslims cannot be trusted

Ben Macintyre: Commentary

At the edge of almost every British cemetery on the Western Front is a corner of a foreign field reserved for non-Christian soldiers: the Hindu, Buddhist and, in many cases, Muslim servicemen who fought and died in British uniform.

Yet the bloody events this week in Texas and Afghanistan will inevitably reinforce a longstanding suspicion that Muslims cannot be trusted, undermining efforts to recruit more into the ranks.

In Helmand, an Afghan police officer killed five British soldiers and fled. In Fort Hood, Major Nidal Malik Hasan shouted Allahu Akbar (God is Great) before opening fire. The two events were separated by thousands of miles; the first was an act of terrorism, while the motives of the second are still being established. But both will bolster a perception that loyalty to Islam will often outweigh loyalty to comrades, uniform, or country.

"His name was Hussain, wasn't it?" said my taxi driver yesterday. "What did they expect?"

... deleted