I thought it already arrived - with Pak. But
according to the Washington Times, it will be arriving with Iran's nuclearization. I doubt it - because Iran's main enemy is Israel, and they back up their words with action. Pakistan's main enemy is only India, and we've all seen what our record is on deterrence - not very good at all.
2 comments:
The article leave a nauseating feeling. It aarogantly advocates the American 'right' to intervene in the affairs of other nations to suit their interests. I hold no love for the current Iranian regime, but the Americans are more interested in a weak Iran that cannot stand up to them when they (the US) make an attempt to grab the Iranian oil reserves. What the Iranians otherwise do with their compatriots would be no issue.
The current demonisation of the Iranian regime no doubt springs from the need to justify the invasion of Iran which the Americans would call a liberation. What the Americans really fear is losing their men. Witness their news lambasting their Government for the numbers of soldiers lost in battle. No mention is made of the number of natives killed whose land the Americans have invaded. Are they not humans with families? Is the loss to their families no loss at all?
It is for such duplicity I find the reports of the American Press lacking in credibility. Exceptions exist, but to prove the rules.
Aside from the fact that there is no "Iranian Invasion" on the horizon as far as the United States is concerned, especially with Obama in the White House, the "natives" allowed those who attacked America to be based in their country (Afghanistan).
As for Iraq, its dictator Saddam, challenged the United States time and time again. In the end, he also got what he asked for.
Post a Comment